Difference between revisions of "Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region/Working meetings/Fourth meeting/article discussion"

From Nuclear Heritage
Jump to navigationJump to search
(link added)
m
Line 31: Line 31:
 
<small><small>{{Footnotes}}</small></small>
 
<small><small>{{Footnotes}}</small></small>
  
 +
<noinclude>
 +
----
 +
 +
== Public Sponsorship <small><small>- Förderung</small></small> ==
 +
[[File:Eu-logo.jpg|280px|left]]
 +
[[File:Eu-logo2.jpg|410px|right]]
 +
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; column-count:2; -moz-column-gap:20px; column-gap:20px;">
 +
 +
[[Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region|This project]] was financed in public sponsorship by the European Union within the program YOUTH IN ACTION. The content of this project does not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the European Union or of the national agency "JUGEND für Europa" and they do not assume any liability.
 +
 +
''[[Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region|Dieses Projekt]] wurde mit Unterstützung der Europäischen Union durch das Programm JUGEND IN AKTION finanziert. Der Inhalt dieses Projektes gibt nicht notwendigerweise den Standpunkt der Europäischen Union oder der Nationalagentur JUGEND für Europa wieder und sie übernehmen dafür keine Haftung.''
 +
</div>
  
 
[[Category: Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region]]
 
[[Category: Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region]]
Line 36: Line 48:
 
[[Category: Project meetings]]
 
[[Category: Project meetings]]
 
[[Category: Germany]]
 
[[Category: Germany]]
 +
</noinclude>

Revision as of 06:20, 18 May 2015


<= 4th project working meeting


Ostrovets NPP

This is what we found useful for improving on the article about the NPP in Belarus. Comments and suggestions are welcome!

  • article is too long for the book
    • create a subpage for the book article with an extract of the main article, see for instance the article on Olkiluoto NPP
  • would be nice to have better understanding of risks (safety concerns) of the NPP
    • there should be also more information on specific risks
    • write the notes in the beginning in complete sentences and provide more detailed information on it
    • mentioning the "dominant western winds" sounds as if it would be a problem if radiation would be spread over Belarus - clarify!
  • style looks like advertising for the nuclear plant, better to improve it
  • fixing future style of writing; style should give more suggestions/possibilities, than fix the perspective like the nuclear industry wishs it
    • phrasing should rather be "is supposed to", "proposed", etc. instead of fixing the future with "will" terms
  • last part should be extracted/put to another part of the article
  • many parts could be described more briefly (date, content, events, etc.)
  • contacts to critics are missing, also data box, photo, links section etc.
  • references should be improved
    • particularly missing for the list of "main participants" and for the "history" section
    • the information where to find additional information (on BELTA - Belarusian Telegraph Agency website) leads to no results - add concrete link or delete it
  • line "under construction" should be removed (all articles in the wiki are the same "under construction" as this one), chapter "news" maybe too - for short version
  • necessary to format view of main page
  • would be good to provide scaring pictures, e.g. what impact an accident in Ostrovets could have - show dread/fears of possible effects of explosion/ pollution
  • necessary to check terms, text, linguistic construction
  • it is unclear what is meant with "a 110/10kV substation Viliya" - please clarify!
  • explain the word "repatriation" - actually it means nuclear waste export to Russia!





Public Sponsorship - Förderung

Eu-logo.jpg
Eu-logo2.jpg

This project was financed in public sponsorship by the European Union within the program YOUTH IN ACTION. The content of this project does not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the European Union or of the national agency "JUGEND für Europa" and they do not assume any liability.

Dieses Projekt wurde mit Unterstützung der Europäischen Union durch das Programm JUGEND IN AKTION finanziert. Der Inhalt dieses Projektes gibt nicht notwendigerweise den Standpunkt der Europäischen Union oder der Nationalagentur JUGEND für Europa wieder und sie übernehmen dafür keine Haftung.