Difference between revisions of "Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region/Working meetings/Fourth meeting/article discussion"
From Nuclear Heritage
Jump to navigationJump to search (updated) |
(+cat) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region}} | {{Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region}} | ||
− | ''' | + | '''[[Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region/Working meetings/Fourth meeting|<= 4th project working meeting]]''' |
== [[Ostrovets NPP]] == | == [[Ostrovets NPP]] == | ||
− | This is what we found useful for improving on the article about the NPP in Belarus. Comments and suggestions are welcome! | + | This is what we found useful for improving on the article about the [[NPP]] in Belarus. Comments and suggestions are welcome! |
* article is too long for the book | * article is too long for the book | ||
** ''create a subpage for the book article with an extract of the main article, see for instance the article on [[Olkiluoto NPP]]'' | ** ''create a subpage for the book article with an extract of the main article, see for instance the article on [[Olkiluoto NPP]]'' | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* contacts to critics are missing, also data box, photo, links section etc. | * contacts to critics are missing, also data box, photo, links section etc. | ||
* references should be improved | * references should be improved | ||
+ | ** ''particularly missing for the list of "main participants" and for the "history" section'' | ||
+ | ** ''the information where to find additional information (on BELTA - Belarusian Telegraph Agency website) leads to no results - add concrete link or delete it'' | ||
* line "under construction" should be removed (all articles in the wiki are the same "under construction" as this one), chapter "news" maybe too - for short version | * line "under construction" should be removed (all articles in the wiki are the same "under construction" as this one), chapter "news" maybe too - for short version | ||
* necessary to format view of main page | * necessary to format view of main page | ||
Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
<small><small>{{Footnotes}}</small></small> | <small><small>{{Footnotes}}</small></small> | ||
− | + | <noinclude> | |
[[Category: Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region]] | [[Category: Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region]] | ||
[[Category: Events]] | [[Category: Events]] | ||
[[Category: Project meetings]] | [[Category: Project meetings]] | ||
[[Category: Germany]] | [[Category: Germany]] | ||
+ | [[Category: English]] | ||
+ | </noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 08:34, 12 January 2016
Project Atomic Threats In The Baltic Sea Region - call out - timeline - book - Nuclear Baltic Map
media group - planning meeting - working meetings - updating internet conferences - coordination - finances
<= 4th project working meeting
Ostrovets NPP
This is what we found useful for improving on the article about the NPP in Belarus. Comments and suggestions are welcome!
- article is too long for the book
- create a subpage for the book article with an extract of the main article, see for instance the article on Olkiluoto NPP
- would be nice to have better understanding of risks (safety concerns) of the NPP
- there should be also more information on specific risks
- write the notes in the beginning in complete sentences and provide more detailed information on it
- mentioning the "dominant western winds" sounds as if it would be a problem if radiation would be spread over Belarus - clarify!
- style looks like advertising for the nuclear plant, better to improve it
- fixing future style of writing; style should give more suggestions/possibilities, than fix the perspective like the nuclear industry wishs it
- phrasing should rather be "is supposed to", "proposed", etc. instead of fixing the future with "will" terms
- last part should be extracted/put to another part of the article
- many parts could be described more briefly (date, content, events, etc.)
- contacts to critics are missing, also data box, photo, links section etc.
- references should be improved
- particularly missing for the list of "main participants" and for the "history" section
- the information where to find additional information (on BELTA - Belarusian Telegraph Agency website) leads to no results - add concrete link or delete it
- line "under construction" should be removed (all articles in the wiki are the same "under construction" as this one), chapter "news" maybe too - for short version
- necessary to format view of main page
- would be good to provide scaring pictures, e.g. what impact an accident in Ostrovets could have - show dread/fears of possible effects of explosion/ pollution
- necessary to check terms, text, linguistic construction
- it is unclear what is meant with "a 110/10kV substation Viliya" - please clarify!
- explain the word "repatriation" - actually it means nuclear waste export to Russia!