Difference between revisions of "File:Patterns Figure12.jpg"

From Nuclear Heritage
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
figure 12 - part of [[Patterns in seismology and palaeoseismology, and their application in long-term hazard assessments - the Swedish case in view of nuclear waste management]].
 
figure 12 - part of [[Patterns in seismology and palaeoseismology, and their application in long-term hazard assessments - the Swedish case in view of nuclear waste management]].
  
'''Figure 12.''' The transformation of a palaeoseismic database into the  
+
'''Figure 12.''' The transformation of a palaeoseismic database into the future (100 000 yr) by doubling the original time frame 10 times. However good the base data is, each time doubling implies a deterioration of the quality of hazard assessment. Somewhere, the validity may even break down. Certainly, however, this methodology is superior to the utilization of short seismic records, which must be discarded as meaningless and misleading.
future (100 000 yr) by doubling the original time frame 10 times.  
 
However good the base data is, each time doubling implies a deteri-
 
oration of the quality of hazard assessment. Somewhere, the valid-
 
ity may even break down. Certainly, however, this methodology is  
 
superior to the utilization of short seismic records, which must be  
 
discarded as meaningless and misleading.
 
  
 
Original source: Scientific paper provided by N.-A. Mörner. Published originally on July 24, 2013 in [http://www.pattern-recogn-phys.net/1/75/2013/prp-1-75-2013.pdf Pattern Recognition in Physics (PRP)]
 
Original source: Scientific paper provided by N.-A. Mörner. Published originally on July 24, 2013 in [http://www.pattern-recogn-phys.net/1/75/2013/prp-1-75-2013.pdf Pattern Recognition in Physics (PRP)]

Latest revision as of 23:12, 29 November 2013

figure 12 - part of Patterns in seismology and palaeoseismology, and their application in long-term hazard assessments - the Swedish case in view of nuclear waste management.

Figure 12. The transformation of a palaeoseismic database into the future (100 000 yr) by doubling the original time frame 10 times. However good the base data is, each time doubling implies a deterioration of the quality of hazard assessment. Somewhere, the validity may even break down. Certainly, however, this methodology is superior to the utilization of short seismic records, which must be discarded as meaningless and misleading.

Original source: Scientific paper provided by N.-A. Mörner. Published originally on July 24, 2013 in Pattern Recognition in Physics (PRP)

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current23:11, 29 November 2013Thumbnail for version as of 23:11, 29 November 20131,033 × 801 (56 KB)Falk (talk | contribs)figure 12 - part of Patterns in seismology and palaeoseismology, and their application in long-term hazard assessments - the Swedish case in view of nuclear waste management. '''Figure 12.''' The transformation of a palaeoseismic database into the...