International Anti-nuclear Network Meeting in Döbeln/Skype conference 25.06.2012

From Nuclear Heritage
Revision as of 21:09, 24 June 2012 by Falk (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

<= Summer Camp 2012

Skype conference 10.06.2012

Agenda's Proposal

1) Set the program by topics:
 a) Presentations | b) Networking | c) Open day?

 a) Wich presentatiion each group would like to sugest?
 b) Network tools? Internacional Uraninum Conference? More sugestions?
 c) There should be a open day in the programme or not? (is that the
    question that was introduce at skype, right?)

 here you can see the programm already schedule (you have to scroll
 down to see it)
 http://www.greenkids.de/europas-atomerbe/index.php/Campaign:International_Anti-nuclear_Gathering_%28Youth_Exchange%29#Partnership.2C_theme_and_activities  

2) Shall be presented other presentations/or do network connected with
   nuclear issues. like:
   - nuclear weapons / militarism problems
   - waste

3) Logistic of the camp ?
   during the day
   excursion

4) Information and Media ?
   presse release in diferent languages? 

5) Financial issues
a) challenge: 30% of travel costs that have to be covered by
   participants themselves
   -> still not solved question - should be discussed
b) travel costs of additional participants ("over age", other
   countries, or if there are more young participants than applied
   for)
   -> we have possibilities with the grant to support at least 10 more
      people with their travel costs (not possible to cover the 30% of
      the participants above with this money); probably we can even
      support travel expenses of much more people, but for that we
      need first to be sure about all the other expenses - this should
      be clarified
c) advanced planning visit issues - the preparation meeting we had
   last weekend was an obligatory element of the grant. actually every
   partner group was supposed to send two people there, but we were
   not able to realize that due to setting the dates on short notice.
   However, we need to have 2 people from each partner country in the
   participants list of this preparation meeting.
   -> As this is very important for the grant, we need to discuss how
      to deal with this issue. There are possibilities we can talk
      about.

6) State of the art - what has been done since the last meeting, what
   is urgently to be done?