PR:Scrap Trident Message Painted on Faslane Fence
Trident Ploughshares Press release
17 December 2014, 3.30 p.m.
Scrap Trident Message Painted on Faslane Fence
Five protesters from the campaign group Trident Ploughshares were arrested today after painting on the Faslane fence a demand for the abolition of all nuclear weapons and for the UK's Trident sytem to be scrapped.
One of the protesters, Brian Quail said "Trident Ploughshares warmly welcomes Nicola Sturgeon's pledge made yesterday with Leanne Wood of Plaid Cymru and Natalie Bennet of the Greens never to work with any Westminster party that supports Trident replacement and calls on the UK government to disarm its nuclear weapons without delay."
We know that the Faslane/Coulport complex is the only site in the whole UK that can accommodate Trident, yet the Scottish Government has no say over the deployment of illegal weapons of mass destruction from here. This makes it essential that Scots vote for anti-Trident parties in the May general election."
"Last week a global conference in Vienna highlighted the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of any use of these weapons", said Janet Fenton, one of the activists. "While the Austrian Government made a pledge to outlaw them, the UK insisted that the way to nuclear disarmament was to build new weapons. It makes no sense and is completely out of step with the majority of countries who want to see nuclear abolition ".
The activists painted directly onto the weldmesh fence that surrounds the base.
The Scrap Trident Coalition, of which Trident Ploughshares is a member, are planning two "Bairns not Bombs" events in the new year, a demonstration in Glasgow on 28th March, and a blockade at Faslane on the 13th of April when they expect to stop work at the base and close it down.
- Brian Larkin +44 7584 492257
- David Mackenzie +44 7876 593016
Notes for editors:
- Vienna Conference: A single detonation of a modern nuclear weapon would cause destruction and human suffering on a scale far exceeding the devastation seen in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. No State or international body would be able to provide adequate assistance. Nuclear weapons continue to pose an existential threat to all humankind. These risks are not abstract. They are real, more serious than previously known and can never be eliminated completely. In the past few years, a growing number of states and many civil society actors focussed on the humanitarian consequences and risks associated with nuclear weapons through different national, regional and international events and activities. Two international conferences were devoted specifically to this issue; in Oslo, Norway, in March 2013 and Nayarit, Mexico, in February 2014. At the third conference held in Vienna on the 8th and 9th of December, the US and UK governments finally agreed to participate. The UK government was represented by an embassy diplomat and the Scottish Government's request to participate in the UK delegation was ignored. At the conclusion of the conference the Austrian Government made a pledge to "fill the legal gap for the prohibition and elimination of nuclear weapons" and pledged "to cooperate with all stakeholders to achieve this goal".
- Illegality Following the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on the legality of nuclear weapons, the aquittal of Trident ploughshares activists on a defence of necessity and the subsequent Lord Advocate's Reference to this case in 2001, a conference was held in Edinburgh which resulted in the publication of Trident and International Law: Scotland's Obligations. The book makes clear that not only states but citizens have obligations to prevent war crimes and crimes against humanity, specifically the current deployment of Trident. H.E. Judge Weeramantry says citizens have the right to act: "Anti-nuclear civil resistance is the right of every citizen of his planet, for the prevention of such an international crime (as the threat or use of nuclear weapons) is basic to human dignity."
- Nowhere to go: The political will in Scotland is to remove nuclear weapons. There is irrefutable evidence that moving them south of the border is not an option, however much Jim Murphy wants to suggest that this could happen. No-one in the MOD has offered any refutation of the findings published in SCND's Nowhere to Go. The facilities that would be needed are: a submarine base to replace Faslane and a nuclear weapons' depot to replace Coulport. The second would be the biggest problem. As an MoD source told the Telegraph, "there simply isn't anywhere else where we can do what we do at Coulport"
Building a nuclear weapons depot at the submarine base at Devonport would be out of the question, because the site is within the city of Plymouth with its population of 250,000. Vanguard class submarines are not allowed to berth at Devonport if they are carrying Trident missiles. There are severe tidal restrictions on access to the dock at Barrow. Like Devonport, Barrow is in an urban area. Political and legal difficulties would preclude basing a UK system in France or the US and changing the system to create a different nuclear weapon would take until the 2040s and be even more prohibitively expensive than Trident.