http://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Radiation_levels_at_the_Gorleben_atomic_waste_repository_too_high&feed=atom&action=historyRadiation levels at the Gorleben atomic waste repository too high - Revision history2024-03-29T01:48:33ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.35.2http://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Radiation_levels_at_the_Gorleben_atomic_waste_repository_too_high&diff=78331&oldid=prevATOMI: +cat2015-06-10T12:54:05Z<p>+cat</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:54, 10 June 2015</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l16" >Line 16:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 16:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Castor]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Castor]]</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Germany]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Germany]]</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[Category: BI Umweltschutz Lüchow-Dannenberg]]</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Legal Issues]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Legal Issues]]</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: English]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: English]]</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div></noinclude></div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div></noinclude></div></td></tr>
</table>ATOMIhttp://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Radiation_levels_at_the_Gorleben_atomic_waste_repository_too_high&diff=78129&oldid=prevATOMI: +cat2015-06-06T15:46:39Z<p>+cat</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 15:46, 6 June 2015</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l17" >Line 17:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 17:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Germany]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Germany]]</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Legal Issues]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Legal Issues]]</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[Category: English]]</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div></noinclude></div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div></noinclude></div></td></tr>
</table>ATOMIhttp://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Radiation_levels_at_the_Gorleben_atomic_waste_repository_too_high&diff=76197&oldid=prevFalk: +cat2015-01-02T20:18:56Z<p>+cat</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 20:18, 2 January 2015</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l16" >Line 16:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 16:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Castor]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Castor]]</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Germany]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Germany]]</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[Category: Legal Issues]]</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div></noinclude></div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div></noinclude></div></td></tr>
</table>Falkhttp://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Radiation_levels_at_the_Gorleben_atomic_waste_repository_too_high&diff=66809&oldid=prevFalk: references exchanged2012-09-13T14:35:20Z<p>references exchanged</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 14:35, 13 September 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l3" >Line 3:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.212 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=37487 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) supported the ''PTB'' interpretation of the measurements<ref>http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com/strahlung-gorleben-laut-t%C3%BCv-auch-durch-weitere-castoren-124400783.html as at October 26, 2011</ref>. A Greenpeace expertise calculated an accumulated annual dose of 0.305 mSv in case the proposed eleven Castor containers would be brought to the [[Gorleben]] repository in November and blamed the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment for miscalculations in their data due to a wrong mixture of different measurements<ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=38034 as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.212 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=37487 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) supported the ''PTB'' interpretation of the measurements<ref>http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com/strahlung-gorleben-laut-t%C3%BCv-auch-durch-weitere-castoren-124400783.html as at October 26, 2011</ref>. A Greenpeace expertise calculated an accumulated annual dose of 0.305 mSv in case the proposed eleven Castor containers would be brought to the [[Gorleben]] repository in November and blamed the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment for miscalculations in their data due to a wrong mixture of different measurements<ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=38034 as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Besides that, the detected neutron radiation in Gorleben, situated 1.9 km from the repository, has been doubled since the beginning of the storage of atomic waste in the facility<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe" />.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Besides that, the detected neutron radiation in Gorleben, situated 1.9 km from the repository, has been doubled since the beginning of the storage of atomic waste in the facility<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe"<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">>https:</ins>/<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">/www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=372&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref</ins>>.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><noinclude></div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><noinclude></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The reason for the difference in the interpretation of the measurements is obvious: the pro-nuclear ''PTB'' calculates with a "natural background" radiation of 0.63 mSv/a instead of the 0.51 mSv/a the ''NLWKN'' uses<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. This is the amount they have to substract from the detected radiation at the repository<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. But, the local anti-nuclear activists argue, the used value for the background radiation is wrong<ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=370&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen" /> as the operator uses data measured only after highly radioactive Castor containers had already been brought to Gorleben<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />. Since 1997 according to public ''GNS'' reports the radiation at the repository rised continuously after the first Castor containers had been brought there<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe"<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">>https:</del>/<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">/www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=372&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref</del>>.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The reason for the difference in the interpretation of the measurements is obvious: the pro-nuclear ''PTB'' calculates with a "natural background" radiation of 0.63 mSv/a instead of the 0.51 mSv/a the ''NLWKN'' uses<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. This is the amount they have to substract from the detected radiation at the repository<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. But, the local anti-nuclear activists argue, the used value for the background radiation is wrong<ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=370&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen" /> as the operator uses data measured only after highly radioactive Castor containers had already been brought to Gorleben<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />. Since 1997 according to public ''GNS'' reports the radiation at the repository rised continuously after the first Castor containers had been brought there<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe" />.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>When the exceeded legal limits were published, the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment denied the facts<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=373&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. In reaction, the ''BI Lüchow-Dannenberg'' presented calculations of their own experts group proofing that the legal limits had been exceeded already since 2003<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />. Thus, they pressed criminal charges against the operator of the repository ''[[Nuclear Companies#GNS|GNS]]'' due to "illegal release of ionizing radiation"<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" /><ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=365&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=363&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The operator tried to trick on the detection results by changing the setting of the Castor containers in the plant concentrating them in the center of the hall to reach more distance from the walls and from the measurement devices<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>When the exceeded legal limits were published, the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment denied the facts<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=373&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. In reaction, the ''BI Lüchow-Dannenberg'' presented calculations of their own experts group proofing that the legal limits had been exceeded already since 2003<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />. Thus, they pressed criminal charges against the operator of the repository ''[[Nuclear Companies#GNS|GNS]]'' due to "illegal release of ionizing radiation"<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" /><ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=365&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=363&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The operator tried to trick on the detection results by changing the setting of the Castor containers in the plant concentrating them in the center of the hall to reach more distance from the walls and from the measurement devices<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />.</div></td></tr>
</table>Falkhttp://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Radiation_levels_at_the_Gorleben_atomic_waste_repository_too_high&diff=64817&oldid=prevLaura Vilnius at 16:24, 7 July 20122012-07-07T16:24:46Z<p></p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 16:24, 7 July 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The legal annual radiation limit for the [[w:Transportbehälterlager Gorleben|Gorleben interim repository for high level radioactive waste]] is 0.3 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=382&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The Lower Saxony authority ''NLWKN'' on the basis of their measurements of the first half year of 2011 calculated an annual dose of 0.32 mSv<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. Thus, no additional [[Castor]] containers with high level atomic waste could be brought to the repository. The proposed 2011 Castor transport would have to be canceled. </div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The legal annual radiation limit for the [[w:Transportbehälterlager Gorleben|Gorleben interim repository for high level radioactive waste]] is 0.3 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=382&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The Lower Saxony authority ''NLWKN'' on the basis of their measurements of the first half year of 2011 calculated an annual dose of 0.32 mSv<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. Thus, no additional [[Castor]] containers with high level atomic waste could be brought to the repository. The proposed 2011 Castor transport would have to be canceled. </div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.212 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=37487 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) supported the ''PTB'' interpretation of the measurements<ref>http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com/strahlung-gorleben-laut-t%C3%BCv-auch-durch-weitere-castoren-124400783.html as at October 26, 2011</ref>. A Greenpeace expertise calculated an accumulated annual dose of 0.305 mSv in case the proposed eleven Castor containers would be brought to the [[Gorleben]] repository in November and blamed the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment for miscalculations in their data due to a wrong mixture of different <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">measuremnts</del><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=38034 as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.212 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=37487 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) supported the ''PTB'' interpretation of the measurements<ref>http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com/strahlung-gorleben-laut-t%C3%BCv-auch-durch-weitere-castoren-124400783.html as at October 26, 2011</ref>. A Greenpeace expertise calculated an accumulated annual dose of 0.305 mSv in case the proposed eleven Castor containers would be brought to the [[Gorleben]] repository in November and blamed the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment for miscalculations in their data due to a wrong mixture of different <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">measurements</ins><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=38034 as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Besides that, the detected neutron radiation in Gorleben, situated 1.9 km from the repository, has been doubled since the beginning of the storage of atomic waste in the facility<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe" />.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Besides that, the detected neutron radiation in Gorleben, situated 1.9 km from the repository, has been doubled since the beginning of the storage of atomic waste in the facility<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe" />.</div></td></tr>
</table>Laura Vilniushttp://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Radiation_levels_at_the_Gorleben_atomic_waste_repository_too_high&diff=61978&oldid=prevFalk: footnotes2012-02-29T10:13:03Z<p>footnotes</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 10:13, 29 February 2012</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l8" >Line 8:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 8:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>When the exceeded legal limits were published, the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment denied the facts<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=373&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. In reaction, the ''BI Lüchow-Dannenberg'' presented calculations of their own experts group proofing that the legal limits had been exceeded already since 2003<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />. Thus, they pressed criminal charges against the operator of the repository ''[[Nuclear Companies#GNS|GNS]]'' due to "illegal release of ionizing radiation"<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" /><ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=365&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=363&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The operator tried to trick on the detection results by changing the setting of the Castor containers in the plant concentrating them in the center of the hall to reach more distance from the walls and from the measurement devices<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>When the exceeded legal limits were published, the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment denied the facts<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=373&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. In reaction, the ''BI Lüchow-Dannenberg'' presented calculations of their own experts group proofing that the legal limits had been exceeded already since 2003<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />. Thus, they pressed criminal charges against the operator of the repository ''[[Nuclear Companies#GNS|GNS]]'' due to "illegal release of ionizing radiation"<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" /><ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=365&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=363&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The operator tried to trick on the detection results by changing the setting of the Castor containers in the plant concentrating them in the center of the hall to reach more distance from the walls and from the measurement devices<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"><small>{{footnotes}}</small></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Nuclear Waste]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Nuclear Waste]]</div></td></tr>
</table>Falkhttp://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Radiation_levels_at_the_Gorleben_atomic_waste_repository_too_high&diff=59388&oldid=prevFalk: gorleben link added2011-10-29T22:32:12Z<p>gorleben link added</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 22:32, 29 October 2011</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The legal annual radiation limit for the [[w:Transportbehälterlager Gorleben|Gorleben interim repository for high level radioactive waste]] is 0.3 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=382&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The Lower Saxony authority ''NLWKN'' on the basis of their measurements of the first half year of 2011 calculated an annual dose of 0.32 mSv<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. Thus, no additional [[Castor]] containers with high level atomic waste could be brought to the repository. The proposed 2011 Castor transport would have to be canceled. </div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The legal annual radiation limit for the [[w:Transportbehälterlager Gorleben|Gorleben interim repository for high level radioactive waste]] is 0.3 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=382&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The Lower Saxony authority ''NLWKN'' on the basis of their measurements of the first half year of 2011 calculated an annual dose of 0.32 mSv<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. Thus, no additional [[Castor]] containers with high level atomic waste could be brought to the repository. The proposed 2011 Castor transport would have to be canceled. </div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.212 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=37487 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) supported the ''PTB'' interpretation of the measurements<ref>http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com/strahlung-gorleben-laut-t%C3%BCv-auch-durch-weitere-castoren-124400783.html as at October 26, 2011</ref>. A Greenpeace expertise calculated an accumulated annual dose of 0.305 mSv in case the proposed eleven Castor containers would be brought to the Gorleben repository in November and blamed the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment for miscalculations in their data due to a wrong mixture of different measuremnts<ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=38034 as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.212 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=37487 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) supported the ''PTB'' interpretation of the measurements<ref>http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com/strahlung-gorleben-laut-t%C3%BCv-auch-durch-weitere-castoren-124400783.html as at October 26, 2011</ref>. A Greenpeace expertise calculated an accumulated annual dose of 0.305 mSv in case the proposed eleven Castor containers would be brought to the <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">[[</ins>Gorleben<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">]] </ins>repository in November and blamed the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment for miscalculations in their data due to a wrong mixture of different measuremnts<ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=38034 as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Besides that, the detected neutron radiation in Gorleben, situated 1.9 km from the repository, has been doubled since the beginning of the storage of atomic waste in the facility<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe" />.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Besides that, the detected neutron radiation in Gorleben, situated 1.9 km from the repository, has been doubled since the beginning of the storage of atomic waste in the facility<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe" />.</div></td></tr>
</table>Falkhttp://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Radiation_levels_at_the_Gorleben_atomic_waste_repository_too_high&diff=59375&oldid=prevFalk: Castor link added2011-10-29T22:24:00Z<p>Castor link added</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 22:24, 29 October 2011</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The legal annual radiation limit for the [[w:Transportbehälterlager Gorleben|Gorleben interim repository for high level radioactive waste]] is 0.3 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=382&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The Lower Saxony authority ''NLWKN'' on the basis of their measurements of the first half year of 2011 calculated an annual dose of 0.32 mSv<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. Thus, no additional Castor containers with high level atomic waste could be brought to the repository. The proposed 2011 Castor transport would have to be canceled. </div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The legal annual radiation limit for the [[w:Transportbehälterlager Gorleben|Gorleben interim repository for high level radioactive waste]] is 0.3 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=382&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The Lower Saxony authority ''NLWKN'' on the basis of their measurements of the first half year of 2011 calculated an annual dose of 0.32 mSv<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. Thus, no additional <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">[[</ins>Castor<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">]] </ins>containers with high level atomic waste could be brought to the repository. The proposed 2011 Castor transport would have to be canceled. </div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.212 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=37487 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) supported the ''PTB'' interpretation of the measurements<ref>http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com/strahlung-gorleben-laut-t%C3%BCv-auch-durch-weitere-castoren-124400783.html as at October 26, 2011</ref>. A Greenpeace expertise calculated an accumulated annual dose of 0.305 mSv in case the proposed eleven Castor containers would be brought to the Gorleben repository in November and blamed the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment for miscalculations in their data due to a wrong mixture of different measuremnts<ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=38034 as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.212 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=37487 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) supported the ''PTB'' interpretation of the measurements<ref>http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com/strahlung-gorleben-laut-t%C3%BCv-auch-durch-weitere-castoren-124400783.html as at October 26, 2011</ref>. A Greenpeace expertise calculated an accumulated annual dose of 0.305 mSv in case the proposed eleven Castor containers would be brought to the Gorleben repository in November and blamed the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment for miscalculations in their data due to a wrong mixture of different measuremnts<ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=38034 as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td></tr>
</table>Falkhttp://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Radiation_levels_at_the_Gorleben_atomic_waste_repository_too_high&diff=59233&oldid=prevFalk: updated2011-10-26T12:12:35Z<p>updated</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:12, 26 October 2011</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The legal annual radiation limit for the [[w:Transportbehälterlager Gorleben|Gorleben interim repository for high level radioactive waste]] is 0.3 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=382&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The Lower Saxony authority ''NLWKN'' on the basis of their measurements of the first half year of 2011 calculated an annual dose of 0.32 mSv<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. Thus, no additional Castor containers with high level atomic waste could be brought to the repository. The proposed 2011 Castor transport would have to be canceled. But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.212 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=37487 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) supported the ''PTB'' interpretation of the measurements<ref>http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com/strahlung-gorleben-laut-t%C3%BCv-auch-durch-weitere-castoren-124400783.html as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The legal annual radiation limit for the [[w:Transportbehälterlager Gorleben|Gorleben interim repository for high level radioactive waste]] is 0.3 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=382&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The Lower Saxony authority ''NLWKN'' on the basis of their measurements of the first half year of 2011 calculated an annual dose of 0.32 mSv<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. Thus, no additional Castor containers with high level atomic waste could be brought to the repository. The proposed 2011 Castor transport would have to be canceled. </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.212 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=37487 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) supported the ''PTB'' interpretation of the measurements<ref>http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com/strahlung-gorleben-laut-t%C3%BCv-auch-durch-weitere-castoren-124400783.html <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">as at October 26, 2011</ref>. A Greenpeace expertise calculated an accumulated annual dose of 0.305 mSv in case the proposed eleven Castor containers would be brought to the Gorleben repository in November and blamed the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment for miscalculations in their data due to a wrong mixture of different measuremnts<ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=38034 </ins>as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Besides that, the detected neutron radiation in Gorleben, situated 1.9 km from the repository, has been doubled since the beginning of the storage of atomic waste in the facility<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe" />.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Besides that, the detected neutron radiation in Gorleben, situated 1.9 km from the repository, has been doubled since the beginning of the storage of atomic waste in the facility<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe" />.</div></td></tr>
</table>Falkhttp://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Radiation_levels_at_the_Gorleben_atomic_waste_repository_too_high&diff=59231&oldid=prevFalk: updated2011-10-26T12:03:26Z<p>updated</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:03, 26 October 2011</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The legal annual radiation limit for the [[w:Transportbehälterlager Gorleben|Gorleben interim repository for high level radioactive waste]] is 0.3 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=382&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The Lower Saxony authority ''NLWKN'' on the basis of their measurements of the first half year of 2011 calculated an annual dose of 0.32 mSv<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. Thus, no additional Castor containers with high level atomic waste could be brought to the repository. The proposed 2011 Castor transport would have to be canceled. But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.<del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">21 </del>mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">is expected</del>.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The legal annual radiation limit for the [[w:Transportbehälterlager Gorleben|Gorleben interim repository for high level radioactive waste]] is 0.3 mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=382&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The Lower Saxony authority ''NLWKN'' on the basis of their measurements of the first half year of 2011 calculated an annual dose of 0.32 mSv<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. Thus, no additional Castor containers with high level atomic waste could be brought to the repository. The proposed 2011 Castor transport would have to be canceled. But, as this result doesn't suit the nuclear industry, new measurements were commissioned. The ''PTB'', a federal authority well-known for their pro-nuclear studies in the past, published their results: 0.<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">212 </ins>mSv/a<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" /><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=369&n=1 <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>http://www.contratom.de/castorticker2011.php?id=37487 </ins>as at October 26, 2011</ref>. An additional expertise by the ''TÜV'' (another expert organization supporting the nuclear industry) <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">supported the ''PTB'' interpretation of the measurements<ref>http://de.nachrichten.yahoo.com/strahlung-gorleben-laut-t%C3%BCv-auch-durch-weitere-castoren-124400783.html as at October 26, 2011</ref></ins>.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Besides that, the detected neutron radiation in Gorleben, situated 1.9 km from the repository, has been doubled since the beginning of the storage of atomic waste in the facility<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe" />.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Besides that, the detected neutron radiation in Gorleben, situated 1.9 km from the repository, has been doubled since the beginning of the storage of atomic waste in the facility<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe" />.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l5" >Line 5:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 5:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The reason for the difference in the interpretation of the measurements is obvious: the pro-nuclear ''PTB'' calculates with a "natural background" radiation of 0.63 mSv/a instead of the 0.51 mSv/a the ''NLWKN'' uses<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. This is the amount they have to substract from the detected radiation at the repository<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. But, the local anti-nuclear activists argue, the used value for the background radiation is wrong<ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=370&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen" /> as the operator uses data measured only after highly radioactive Castor containers had already been brought to Gorleben<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />. Since 1997 according to public ''GNS'' reports the radiation at the repository rised continuously after the first Castor containers had been brought there<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=372&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The reason for the difference in the interpretation of the measurements is obvious: the pro-nuclear ''PTB'' calculates with a "natural background" radiation of 0.63 mSv/a instead of the 0.51 mSv/a the ''NLWKN'' uses<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. This is the amount they have to substract from the detected radiation at the repository<ref name="gorleben-castor_prognose" />. But, the local anti-nuclear activists argue, the used value for the background radiation is wrong<ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=370&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref name="gorleben-castor_messen" /> as the operator uses data measured only after highly radioactive Castor containers had already been brought to Gorleben<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />. Since 1997 according to public ''GNS'' reports the radiation at the repository rised continuously after the first Castor containers had been brought there<ref name="gorleben-castor_vorwuerfe">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=372&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>When the exceeded legal limits were published, the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment denied the facts<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=373&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. In reaction, the ''BI Lüchow-Dannenberg'' presented calculations of their own experts group proofing that the legal limits had been exceeded already since 2003<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />. Thus, they pressed criminal charges against the operator of the repository ''[[Nuclear Companies#GNS|GNS]]'' due to "illegal release of ionizing radiation"<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" /><ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=365&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The operator tried to trick on the detection results by changing the setting of the Castor containers in the plant concentrating them in the center of the hall to reach more distance from the walls and from the measurement devices<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>When the exceeded legal limits were published, the Lower Saxony Ministry of Environment denied the facts<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz">https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=373&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. In reaction, the ''BI Lüchow-Dannenberg'' presented calculations of their own experts group proofing that the legal limits had been exceeded already since 2003<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />. Thus, they pressed criminal charges against the operator of the repository ''[[Nuclear Companies#GNS|GNS]]'' due to "illegal release of ionizing radiation"<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" /><ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=365<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref><ref>https://www.gorleben-castor.de/index.php?cont=news&id=363</ins>&n=1 as at October 26, 2011</ref>. The operator tried to trick on the detection results by changing the setting of the Castor containers in the plant concentrating them in the center of the hall to reach more distance from the walls and from the measurement devices<ref name="gorleben-castor_resonanz" />.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Nuclear Waste]]</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[Category: Nuclear Waste]]</div></td></tr>
</table>Falk