Difference between revisions of "Schacht Konrad"

From Nuclear Heritage
Jump to navigationJump to search
(updated)
(+cat)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 28: Line 28:
  
  
== Safety Concerns ==
+
[[File:Schnitt-durch-Konrad-SW-NE.png|thumb|right|Schacht Konrad iron mine]]
For decades pre-eminent geologists have contended that the Gorleben salt dome would not be a safe final repository for all kinds of nuclear waste, which it is intended to be from 2030 on.
+
== Safety Issues ==
 +
The calculations for the longterm safety are mainly based on assumptions, not on data. These calculations are now several decades old, not on the current scientific level and have been questioned.
  
In 1987 a shaft almost collapsed, water kept breaking in as the pit went deeper and was enlarged. The Gorleben pit is camouflaged as an “exploratory mine”; that means all work on it is governed by mining law, which excludes public scrutiny.
+
Operational dangers, stemming for example from the many transports in the dense industrial area around Salzgitter, were not considered in the approval. A catastrophe could lead to a considerable radioactive contamination across several kilometers, so that no one should stay in this area for a prolonged time period.
  
Only a local landowner, Count Bernstorff, whose salt rights were impinged, was able to litigate. Meanwhile the Salinas Salz (salt mining) company has emerged as an economically serious challenger to the construction of a final repository.  
+
A EU-wide usage cannot be legally ruled out anymore. Foreign deliverers cannot be controlled, and as a detailed receiving control is not planned this could have devastating consequences.
  
 +
The possibility of a drowning of KONRAD is deliberately taken into account and also conceded by the operator. The planned repository lies in a groundwater-conducting layer, which has direct contact to the biosphere between Braunschweig and Wolfsburg. Consequently, the repository does not meet the requirements laid out by the BfS in its synthesis report in 2005 for questions concerning the reposition of nuclear waste. Both in this report, as well as in the AkEnd (a board of experts on reposition), it is concluded that a future repository should lie in maiden geological strata and not in a mine that has been economically used. This should ensure that the barrier function of the overburden has not been over strained, as in the cases of [[Asse II|Asse]] and [[Morsleben]]. This barrier has the key function in reposition concepts in deep geological strata, but is not intact in KONRAD. Therefore, the isolation potential of the mine is insufficient.
  
[[Image:NuclearHeritage Infoflyer Gorleben map1.jpg|Graphic of the Gorleben salt dome|thumb|right]]
+
A further danger stems from the delivered waste while it is on the pit grounds. The transport into the mine will not follow immediately after the delivery and a temporary storage will be required. However, this has neither been labeled nor approved as de facto temporary storage.
== Background ==
 
It is no mere assumption that the decision for the “nuclear disposal center” Gorleben was a political one. 17 years later the then vice-president of the Geological Survey of Lower Saxony,  Prof. Gerd Lüttig, reported how Gorleben came to be named. Premier Albrecht was annoyed and said to the professor: “The GDR (then communist East Germany) made us so angry with the Morsleben final repository that we’re annoying them back now with Gorleben.” Morsleben lies directly east of what used to be the inter-German border, Gorleben lies only 2 km from that former line. Had there been an atomic disaster in Gorleben at the time, more than 70% of the people who would have suffered within a radius of 30 km would have lived in the former communist German state. An area of about 7½ square kilometres over the salt dome lacks a protective overburden. And also where an overburden exists, it has holes. That means that ultimately underground water flows will carry death-bringing radioactive isotopes into the biosphere. Hence we speak of an “atomic toilet with upward water flushing”. Not something anyone would install in their home, is it?
 
  
Prof. Eckhard Grimmel, a geomorphologist at Hamburg University, who studied Gorleben for a long time, warns about layers where water runs, the lack of barrier and the mobility of the salt dome. The salt dome extends under the Elbe River to the village of Rambow, about 20 km in a straight line northeast of Gorleben. It has collapsed at several places, creating lakes that have become tourist attractions.
 
  
Since there is no overburden as an effective barrier against the dispersal of long-lived radionuclides, the salt dome would have to carry the entire long-term “safety burden” on its own. The stored containers would offer no protection whatsoever because they would corrode in the aggressive medium salt. Hence the Gorleben salt dome is not suited short-term or long-term for final storage of highly radioactive waste.
 
  
From 1980, Prof. Grimmel advised the German Parliament about possibilities of disposing of radioactive wastes. In his new book “Kreisläufe der Erde” (circuits of the earth, ISBN: 3-8258-8212-8) he warns against making Gorleben a final repository: “It has been certain since 1984 that this salt dome is unsuitable as a final repository.” Grimmel summarises: “The salt dome is not separated from water-carrying layers by an adequately mighty and gapless layer of clay. The salt dome is not  at rest and still rises. Through salt dissolution the dome has already lost much of its substance and is being leached further. Additionally, it is doubtful that salt is fundamentally suitable for the final storage of highly radioactive wastes. Uncontrollable reactions of the salt (radiolysis [dissociation of molecules by radiation]), initiated by heat absorption and radiation, additionally endanger the stability of the salt dome.”
+
== Demands ==
 +
* The approval of Schacht Konrad cannot be permitted to take effect!
 +
* Based on the experiences from [[Asse II|ASSE II]] and [[Morsleben]], the concept of a maintenance-free irretrievable final reposition needs to be reevaluated.
 +
* Following the reevaluation of the reposition concept, the best achievable solution for the existing and newly produced nuclear waste needs to be sought. This means that in the framework of a solely national solution a search for a location needs to be started without prior fixing onto Konrad and [[Gorleben]].
 +
* No further waste of tax money through the development and extension of Schacht Konrad!
  
There are more installations in the Gorleben nuclear complex: An interim storage for weak to medium radioactive waste, an interim repository for highly radioactive waste and a conditioning plant which is not in operation. The interim storage for highly radioactive waste is known from the transports of Castor casks, which are regularly blockaded by determined protesters despite martial-scale deployments of police. Every transport into the interim repository makes Gorleben more likely to become the final repository. Although a moratorium was imposed, the Castors keep coming, creating unnecessary pressure to make Gorleben the final dump.
 
  
  
 
== Independent Organizations... ==
 
== Independent Organizations... ==
=== BI Umweltschutz Lüchow-Dannenberg e.V. ===
+
=== Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schacht KONRAD e.V. ===
:Rosenstr. 20 | D-29439 Lüchow
+
:Bleckenstedter Str. 14a | D-38239 Salzgitter
:Tel.: +49 5841 / 46 84 | Fax: +49 5841 / 31 97
+
:Tel.: +49 5341/900194 | Fax: +49 5341/900195
:[mailto:BueroATbi-luechow-dannenberg.de Buero AT bi-luechow-dannenberg.de]{{Spamprotection}}
+
:[mailto:infoATag-schacht-konrad.de info AT ag-schacht-konrad.de]{{Spamprotection}}
  
=== WiderSetzen ===
+
=== Bündnis Salzgitter gegen Schacht KONRAD ===
:[mailto:infoATwidersetzen.de info AT widersetzen.de]{{Spamprotection}} | http://www.widersetzen.de
+
:c/o IG Metall Salzgitter
 
+
:Chemnitzer Str. 33 | D-38226 Salzgitter
=== WiderStandsnest Metzingen ===
+
:Tel.: +49 5341/884425 | Fax: +49 5341/884420
:Tollendorf 9 | D-29473 Göhrde
+
:[mailto:ina.biethanATigmetall.de ina.biethan AT igmetall.de]{{Spamprotection}}
:Tel.: +49 5862 / 985 991 | [mailto:trotzalledemATgmx.net trotzalledem AT gmx.net]{{Spamprotection}}
 
 
 
=== CASTOR NIX-DA ===
 
:OT Ganse | Im Rundling 12 | D-29462 Wustrow
 
:Tel.: +49 5843 / 619 | Fax: +49 0321 / 212 173 60
 
:[mailto:RedaktionATcastor.de Redaktion AT castor.de]{{Spamprotection}} | http://www.castor.de
 
 
 
=== Bäuerliche Notgemeinschaft ===
 
:[mailto:redaktionATbaeuerliche-notgemeinschaft.de redaktion AT baeuerliche-notgemeinschaft.de]{{Spamprotection}}
 
:http://www.baeuerliche-notgemeinschaft.de
 
 
 
=== KURVE Wustrow ===
 
:Kirchstr. 14 | D-29462 Wustrow
 
:Tel.: +49 5843 / 98 710 | Fax: +49 5843 / 987 111
 
:[mailto:infoATkurvewustrow.org info AT kurvewustrow.org]{{Spamprotection}} | http://www.kurvewustrow.org
 
 
 
=== ContrAtom ===
 
:[mailto:infoATcontratom.de info AT contratom.de]{{Spamprotection}} | http://www.contratom.de
 
  
  
 
== ... Support ==
 
== ... Support ==
Beside your active contribution you can support our criticism towards the nuclear waste final repository by donations:
+
Besides your active contribution, you can support our criticism concerning the final repository for nuclear waste through a donation to one of the following organizations:
  
* ''Account Holder:'' '''Bürgerinitiative Umweltschutz Lüchow-Dannenberg'''
+
* ''Account Holder:'' '''Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schacht KONRAD'''
* ''IBAN:'' '''DE24258501100044060721'''
+
* ''IBAN:'' '''DE81250100300378752308'''
* ''BIC:'' '''NOLADE21UEL'''
+
* ''BIC:'' '''PBNKDEFF'''
* ''Bank:'' '''KSK Lüchow'''
+
* ''Bank:'' '''Postbank Hannover'''
  
  
 
== Web-sites... ==
 
== Web-sites... ==
* [http://www.bi-luechow-dannenberg.de Civic Initiative for Environment Protection]
+
* [http://www.ag-schacht-konrad.de Critics]
* [http://www.castor.de Castor-Nix-Da Campaign]
+
* [http://www.bfs.de Operator of the repository]
* [http://www.castor.de/diskus/gruppen/uebersicht.html Initiatives against the nuclear facilities in Gorleben]
 
* [http://www.castor.de/technik/endlager/endlagerinhalt.html More reports, press coverage and expert studies]
 
* [http://www.dbe.de Operator of the “exploratory mine”]
 
  
  
  
Download this text as a flyer (A4, 2 pages, 600dpi) in [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/images/b/b5/EuropasAtomerbe_Infoflyer_Gorleben_600dpi.pdf German] or [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/images/2/21/NuclearHeritage_Infoflyer_Gorleben_300dpi.pdf English]''
+
Download this text as a flyer (A4, 2 pages, 600dpi) in [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/images/4/49/EuropasAtomerbe_Infoflyer_KONRAD_600dpi.pdf German] or [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/images/3/37/NuclearHeritage_Infoflyer_KONRAD_300dpi.pdf English]''
  
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
* [[we:Gorleben_salt_dome|Wikipedia: Gorleben salt dome]]
+
* [[we:Konrad mine|Wikipedia: Konrad mine]]
  
  
<small>{{Footnotes}}</small>
+
<small><small>{{Footnotes}}</small></small>
  
  
 
[[Category: Nuclear Waste Repository]]
 
[[Category: Nuclear Waste Repository]]
 
[[Category: Germany]]
 
[[Category: Germany]]
 +
[[Category: Legal Issues]]
 +
[[Category: Plutonium]]

Latest revision as of 10:44, 4 April 2015

Photo of the Schacht Konrad final repository mine

Information on the Final Repository Schacht KONRAD



Introduction

Schacht KONRAD, the Konrad pit, is a decommissioned ore mine in the industrial heart of the steel city Salzgitter. Between 2013 and 2080, it is envisaged to deposit 303,000 m³ of solid or solidified radioactive waste with negligible thermal activity in this mine and keep them safe for a million years. This includes waste from nuclear reprocessing that contains plutonium, as well as operational waste from the energy industry and nuclear research. The federal government expects that the portion of nuclear waste from medical applications will lie in the order of a thousandth. These 303,000 m³ may contain 865 kg of plutonium.

20,000 industrial jobs and high-grade agricultural areas are located in the immediate vicinity of KONRAD.


Time Line

  • 1957-65 Drilling and construction of the ore mine Schacht KONRAD.
  • 1965-76 Mining activity – from the start, the iron ore mining is under high financial and rationalization pressure (1,000 - 1,300 m depth, sour ore, Fe-content >33%) and is stopped again in October 1976 after only 10 1⁄2 operational years. The works council proposes to use the mine for other purposes, such as the storage of problematic waste.
  • 1976-82 Exploration – Schacht KONRAD is examined for its suitability as repository for low level radioactive waste and large size components from the dismantling of nuclear power plants.
  • 31/08/82 Application for the initiation of a plan approval procedure. As reaction the so far largest demonstration against the project takes place with 12,000 participants on October 30, 1982.
  • 1985/86 Fundamental extension of the plan application. The criterion for the reposition is changed from dose rate (low and intermediate level) to degree of thermal activity: The surrounding host rock should not be warmed by more than 3 degrees. This would allow to deposit 95 % of the German radioactive waste in KONRAD.
  • 1991 The federal administration issues a directive to force the public display of the plan documents; across Germany 289,387 objections are entered that are delivered to Hanover on July, 13, with a convoy of tractors and handed over to Monika Griefahn, then environmental Minister of the state Lower Saxony.
  • 1992/93 Between September '92 and March '93, a 75-day marathon hearing takes place preluded by a demonstration with 7,000 people rallying against KONRAD.
  • 2000 For the atomic treaty the federal government and the nuclear energy industry agree on an approval of KONRAD.
  • 22/05/02 The state approves the plan. The environmental Minister of Lower Saxony, Jüttner (SPD), and the Federal Minister for the Environment, Trittin (Green Party), blame each other for being responsible.
  • 2002-07 Law suits entered by an agricultural family and three municipalities fail first at the OVG (higher administrative court) Lüneburg, and later at the BVG (federal administrative court) in Leipzig. Both farmer Traube and the city of Salzgitter enter a constitutional appeal that, however, has no further dilatory effect. The appeal of the city Salzgitter is rejected, while the decision in the second case has not yet been issued.


Konrad2.jpg


Schacht Konrad iron mine

Safety Issues

The calculations for the longterm safety are mainly based on assumptions, not on data. These calculations are now several decades old, not on the current scientific level and have been questioned.

Operational dangers, stemming for example from the many transports in the dense industrial area around Salzgitter, were not considered in the approval. A catastrophe could lead to a considerable radioactive contamination across several kilometers, so that no one should stay in this area for a prolonged time period.

A EU-wide usage cannot be legally ruled out anymore. Foreign deliverers cannot be controlled, and as a detailed receiving control is not planned this could have devastating consequences.

The possibility of a drowning of KONRAD is deliberately taken into account and also conceded by the operator. The planned repository lies in a groundwater-conducting layer, which has direct contact to the biosphere between Braunschweig and Wolfsburg. Consequently, the repository does not meet the requirements laid out by the BfS in its synthesis report in 2005 for questions concerning the reposition of nuclear waste. Both in this report, as well as in the AkEnd (a board of experts on reposition), it is concluded that a future repository should lie in maiden geological strata and not in a mine that has been economically used. This should ensure that the barrier function of the overburden has not been over strained, as in the cases of Asse and Morsleben. This barrier has the key function in reposition concepts in deep geological strata, but is not intact in KONRAD. Therefore, the isolation potential of the mine is insufficient.

A further danger stems from the delivered waste while it is on the pit grounds. The transport into the mine will not follow immediately after the delivery and a temporary storage will be required. However, this has neither been labeled nor approved as de facto temporary storage.


Demands

  • The approval of Schacht Konrad cannot be permitted to take effect!
  • Based on the experiences from ASSE II and Morsleben, the concept of a maintenance-free irretrievable final reposition needs to be reevaluated.
  • Following the reevaluation of the reposition concept, the best achievable solution for the existing and newly produced nuclear waste needs to be sought. This means that in the framework of a solely national solution a search for a location needs to be started without prior fixing onto Konrad and Gorleben.
  • No further waste of tax money through the development and extension of Schacht Konrad!


Independent Organizations...

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schacht KONRAD e.V.

Bleckenstedter Str. 14a | D-38239 Salzgitter
Tel.: +49 5341/900194 | Fax: +49 5341/900195
info AT ag-schacht-konrad.de[1]

Bündnis Salzgitter gegen Schacht KONRAD

c/o IG Metall Salzgitter
Chemnitzer Str. 33 | D-38226 Salzgitter
Tel.: +49 5341/884425 | Fax: +49 5341/884420
ina.biethan AT igmetall.de[1]


... Support

Besides your active contribution, you can support our criticism concerning the final repository for nuclear waste through a donation to one of the following organizations:

  • Account Holder: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schacht KONRAD
  • IBAN: DE81250100300378752308
  • BIC: PBNKDEFF
  • Bank: Postbank Hannover


Web-sites...


Download this text as a flyer (A4, 2 pages, 600dpi) in German or English


External links


  1. 1.0 1.1 For protection against automatical email address robots searching for addresses to send spam to them this email address has been made unreadable for them. To get a correct mail address you have to displace "AT" by the @-symbol.