Difference between revisions of "Visaginas NPP"

From Nuclear Heritage
Jump to navigationJump to search
(resource added)
 
(93 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The city Visaginas is situated in the northeast of Lithuania. It had been founded in 1975 as Sniečkus for the workers of the [[Ignalina NPP]] on the shores of the lake Visaginas. Four villages had been demolished for that workers' town, with the biggest one of them known as Visaginas.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Visaginas&oldid=445363068 as at October 15, 2011</ref>
+
<div style="float: right;">
 +
{| class="plainlinks" style="margin: 0 0 1em 1em; border: thin grey solid" width="280"
 +
|-
 +
! style="width:30%;" |
 +
! style="width:70%;" |
 +
|-
 +
|colspan="2" style="background: #dddddd; text-align: center; font-size: larger;"| '''Technical Data'''
 +
|| <strong>Visaginas NPP</strong>
 +
|-
 +
|colspan="2" style="background: #F0F0F0; font-weight:bold"|General information
 +
|-
 +
|''Owner:''|| The company representing investors - yet to be formed 
 +
|-
 +
|<br>
 +
|-
 +
|''Developer:'' || [http://le.lt State company group Lietuvos energija (LE)]
 +
|-
 +
|<br>
 +
|-
 +
|''Location:'' ||  Visaginas Municipality, Lithuania
 +
|-
 +
|<br>
 +
|-
 +
|''Territory:'' ||
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
|''Reactor:'' || ABWR
 +
|-
 +
|''Capacity:'' || 1,358 MW
 +
|-
 +
|-
 +
|''Number of reactors:'' || 2
 +
|-
 +
|''Type of Waste'': ||
 +
|-
 +
|colspan="2" style="background: #F0F0F0; font-weight:bold"|Safety issues
 +
|-
 +
|''Total Radioactivity:'' ||
 +
|-
 +
|''Sanitary Protection Zone'': ||  km
 +
|-
 +
|''Population of the area:''|| 
 +
|-
 +
|colspan="2" style="background: #F0F0F0; font-weight:bold"|Construction data
 +
|-
 +
|''Construction to start:'' || 2015
 +
|-
 +
|''Status:'' || Not clear (as of March 2014)
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
</div>
 +
== Summary ==
 +
'''Visaginas''' [[NPP]] is a regional project intended to provide electricity for Lithuania instead of in 2009 closed [[Ignalina NPP]]. As of October 2013, there are 3 regional partners - Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia involved in the project, in addition to strategic investor ''GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy''. NPP would be jointly owned by Japanese company Hitachi and Japanese American company GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (20 percent shares), and state owned companies Lietuvos Energija (owned by the Republic of Lithuania) (38 percent), Latvenergo (owned by the Republic of Latvia) (20 percent) and Eesti Energia (owned by the Republic of Estonia) (22 percent). In 2012, Lithuanian citizens voted against building a new NPP in the country. However, high level talks about building the plant continue.
 +
The estimated price is 17 billion Litas (4,9 billion Euros).
  
−
Proposals to construct a new NPP at the old Ignalina NPP site, that had been closed in accordance with Lithuania's accession agreement to the EU<ref name="Visaginas">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Visaginas_Nuclear_Power_Plant&oldid=447180300 as at October 15, 2011</ref> at the end of 2009, have been made since 2007<ref name="Ignalina">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ignalina_Nuclear_Power_Plant&oldid=451980296 as at October 15, 2011</ref>. First discussions regarding new reactors started alread in the 1990s and were continued in the 2000s<ref name="Visaginas" />. In October 2011, the Lithuanian government informed the European Union about their construction plans<ref name="nuklearforum">http://www.nuklearforum.ch/ebarticle.php?art_id=de-131842098266&id=de-116487550462--p-1 as at October 15, 2011</ref>.
 
  
−
The ''Visaginas Nuclear Plant Company'' has been set up by electricity companies of Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, and Poland on July 30, 2008 to be responsible for the construction of the new NPP. It is supposed to be a 1,300 MW boiling water reactor<ref name="nuklearforum" /> while earlier a maximum capacity of up to 3,400 MW distributed over two reactors had been announced<ref name="Visaginas" />. On July 14, 2011<ref name="nuklearforum" /> the ''GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy'' has been selected as a strategic investor of the project.<ref name="Ignalina" /> The estimated construction costs will be up to 5 billion Euros<ref name="Visaginas" />. In 2020 the NPP is supposed to be ready to be connected to the grid<ref name="Visaginas" />.
+
== Critics ==
 +
<span style="color:grey">''contact details of critical groups working against this facility''</span>
 +
* <span style="color:grey">''group name, phone, email, website, postal address''</span>
 +
* '''NGO "Community Atgaja"'''
 +
:phone: +370 699 33661
 +
:email: [mailto:infoATatgaja.lt info AT atgaja.lt]{{Spamprotection}}
 +
:http://www.atgaja.lt
 +
* '''NGO "Susivienijimas ŽALI.LT"'''
 +
:phone: +370 654 73926
 +
:email: [mailto:zali.vilniusATgmail.com zali.vilnius AT gmail.com]{{Spamprotection}}
 +
:http://www.zali.lt
 +
* '''Public Enterprise "Green Policy Institute"'''
 +
:phone: +370 5 213 1353
 +
:email: [mailto:infoATzaliojipolitika.lt info AT zaliojipolitika.lt]{{Spamprotection}}
 +
:http://www.zaliojipolitika.lt
  
−
* an international [[Nuclear Waste and Pollution Conference in Vilnius 2011|anti-nuclear conference]] focusing on the new NPP construction plans of Lithuania, Belarus and Kaliningrad (Russia) will take place in Vilnius (LT) on December 6-8, 2011
+
 
 +
== Links ==
 +
* '''Promoter of Visaginas:''' http://www.vae.lt/en/  <small><small>Lithuanian/English</small></small>
 +
* '''Critical view on Visaginas:'''
 +
** http://www.gyva.lt/articles/category/15 <small><small>Lithuanian</small></small>
 +
** http://www.atgaja.lt <small><small>Lithuanian</small></small>
 +
** http://www.atomine.lt <small><small>Lithuanian/English/Russian</small></small>
 +
** http://www.banktrack.org/show/dodgydeals/visaginas_nuclear_power_plant <small>English</small>
 +
* '''Authorities' information on Visaginas:'''
 +
** http://www.vatesi.lt/index.php?id=54 <small><small>Lithuanian/English</small></small>
 +
** http://www.enmin.lt/lt/activity/veiklos_kryptys/strateginiai_projektai/nae/index.php?clear_cache=Y <small><small>Lithuanian/English</small></small>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Background ==
 +
The city of Visaginas is situated in the northeast of Lithuania, 150 km from Vilnius and 8 km from the border with Latvia. It was founded in 1975 for the workers of the [[Ignalina NPP]] on the shores of Lake Visaginas and was named Sniečkus. Four villages had been demolished for that workers' town, with the biggest one of them known as Visaginas.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Visaginas&oldid=445363068 as at October 15, 2011</ref>
 +
 
 +
Proposals to construct a new NPP at the old Ignalina NPP site, that had been closed in accordance with Lithuania's accession agreement to the EU<ref name="Visaginas">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Visaginas_Nuclear_Power_Plant&oldid=447180300 as at October 15, 2011</ref> at the end of 2009, have been made since 2007<ref name="Ignalina">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ignalina_Nuclear_Power_Plant&oldid=451980296 as at October 15, 2011</ref>. First discussions regarding new reactors started already in the 1990s and were continued in the 2000s<ref name="Visaginas" />. In October 2011, the Lithuanian government informed the European Union about their construction plans<ref name="nuklearforum">http://www.nuklearforum.ch/ebarticle.php?art_id=de-131842098266&id=de-116487550462--p-1 as at October 15, 2011</ref>. In June 8, 2012 European Commission issued a positive opinion about the project <ref>http://ec.europa.eu/energy/doc/nuclear/2012_06_11_visaginas.pdf</ref>.
 +
 
 +
The main reason Visaginas NPP proponents give for building new NPP in Lithuania is supposed energetic independence from Russia <ref>http://www.enmin.lt/lt/activity/veiklos_kryptys/strateginiai_projektai/vae.php?clear_cache=Y</ref>.
 +
 
 +
The ''Visaginas Nuclear Plant Company'' have been set up by electricity companies of Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, and Poland on July 30, 2008 to be responsible for the construction of the new NPP. Poland later withdrew from the project. It is supposed to be a 1,300 MW boiling water reactor<ref name="nuklearforum" /> while earlier a maximum capacity of up to 3,400 MW distributed over two reactors had been announced<ref name="Visaginas" />. On July 14, 2011<ref name="nuklearforum" /> the ''GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy'' has been selected as a strategic investor of the project.<ref name="Ignalina" /> The estimated construction costs is 5 billion Euros<ref name="Visaginas" />. However, given interest, inflation and expenses caused by changes in the value of investments it is likely that the costs will be 6.8 billion Euros <ref>http://www.diena.lv/bizness/finanses/visaginas-aes-buvnieciba-sadardzinas-13953556.</ref>.
 +
 
 +
On October 14th, 2012, 62,6 percent of Lithuanian citizens, who attended a nation-wide consultative referendum, voted "No" on a statement “I am in favor of constructing a new nuclear power plant in the Republic of Lithuania”. After that, Lithuanian politicians were trying to downplay the results of the referendum, questioning the legal consequences of the referendum. The results of the referendum are legally binding according to the Law on Referendum <ref>http://www.gyva.lt/articles/view/279</ref>. Following the referendum, Lithuanian Parliament formed a special working group in the Parliament, to suggest how to implement the results of the referendum <ref>http://www.15min.lt/naujiena/aktualu/lietuva/darbo-grupei-del-naujos-atomines-elektrines-likimo-vadovaus-irena-siauliene-56-283295#ixzz2iAMnC67o</ref>. The working group suggested that the Government should prepare the most cost-optimal and consumer friendly strategy of electricity supply for Lithuania <ref>http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=439062&p_tr2=2</ref>. Following that, the Government formed a work group to analyze the project and to propose the most cost-optimal and consumer friendly model of Lithuanian energy supply system. The chairperson of the group was Energy Minister Jaroslavas Neverovičius <ref>http://www.enmin.lt/lt/news/detail.php?ID=2563</ref>. Lithuanian Energy Institute (LEI), which was consulted by the working group, concluded that flexible non-nuclear scenario would be more beneficial to Lithuania <ref>http://vz.lt/article/2013/5/5/vae-tyrimas-neivertina-investiciju-trukumo?pageno=0</ref>. According to LEI, such issues as the problem of spent nuclear fuel management or the risk of catastrophies have to be evaluated, when assessing the possibility to buid such a power plant <ref>http://de.slideshare.net/EkonomikaLT/elektros-energetikos-sistemos-perspektyvin-raida-ir-visagino-ae-ekonomiko-efektyvumo-tyrimas</ref>.   
 +
 
 +
The group has concluded that it is not possible to evaluate now, what impact Visaginas NPP might have to sinchronization of European grid, as well as it is not possible to evaluate the questions of Visaginas NPP power reserve <ref>http://www.enmin.lt/lt/konkursai/konkursai_i_tarnyba/Darbogrupesisvados.pdf http://www.enmin.lt/lt/naujienos/Conclusions_of_the_Working_Group2.pdf</ref>. The working group proposed the "balanced and diversified energy self-provision scenario", based on "safe nuclear energy development", together with renewables. local CHP energy development, diversified gas supply sources and diversified import <ref>http://www.enmin.lt/lt/naujienos/Conclusions_of_the_Working_Group2.pdf</ref>. The work group stated that continuation of Visaginas NPP project is possible only if it meets "additional conditions": a) if expenses, responsibilities and risks are shared between Regional Partners and this is established in legal agreements; b) if financing is ensured at the lowest costs; c) if "sustained and comprehensive public awareness of the project" is ensured, "considering the fact that the project can be implemented only if national agreement on rational, competitive, sustainable and perspective electricity supply is in place." <ref>http://www.enmin.lt/lt/naujienos/Conclusions_of_the_Working_Group2.pdf</ref>. Following this statement, Lithuanian Government continued talks with "Hitachi". The reactor constructor said that they will improve economic conditions of the project <ref>http://www.enmin.lt/lt/apie_energetika/detail.php?ID=3017&sphrase_id=23345</ref>. In October 2013, Prime Minister Algirdas Butkevičius announced that he sees possibilities to improve the project, while Deputy Energy Minister Aleksandras Spruogis has declared that the project has already been improved and the project now is competitive <ref>http://www.15min.lt/en/article/politics/lithuanian-deputy-energy-minister-improved-visaginas-npp-project-is-competitive-526-376093</ref>. Few days later, the CEO of "Lithuanian Energy" Dalius Misiūnas said that the project was improved, but is not yet commercially viable; according to him, new nuclear NPPs either in Lithuania or in Europe will need to be subsidized <ref>http://www.15min.lt/naujiena/verslas/energetika/naujas-visagino-ae-projektas-patrauklesnis-bet-vis-tiek-silpnas-664-377667</ref>. 
 +
 
 +
In November 2012, Lithuanian Public Procurement Office determined that the "Visaginas Nuclear Power Plant Company" unlawfully bought additional legal services, business consulting, financial advisor and media planning services, by choosing direct agreement as a mean of procurement <ref>http://www.15min.lt/en/article/business/lithuania-s-visaginas-nuclear-power-plant-ordered-to-cancel-contracts-with-herbert-smith-rothschild-bvrg-527-279334#ixzz2kjRghIwe</ref>.
 +
 
 +
Despite Latvia and Estonia are officially the partners of the project, there has been a certain reluctancy demonstrated by them towards the project. For example, on November 2013, the director of Estonian energy company "Elering" said that the project is not necessary for the region <ref>http://www.15min.lt/naujiena/verslas/energetika/estijos-energetikos-imones-elering-atstovas-taavi-veskimagi-visagino-atomine-elektrine-regionui-nera-butina-664-384345?cf=vl</ref>. 
 +
 
 +
The Temporary Parliamentary Commission, which analysed former, conservatory government's work in the energy sector, on March 25th, 2014, suggested to turn to Prosecutor General's Office over 8 possible corruption cases. <ref>http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/energy/?doc=89531</ref> Two before the trial investigations on Visaginas NPP are already being undertaken.<ref>http://www.alfa.lt/straipsnis/15832690/laikinoji-energetikos-komisija-konservatoriai-energetikos-pertvarkai-pasitelke-savo-paciu-kritikuota-leo-lt-aptarnavusias-kontoras</ref>
 +
 
 +
The member of the Commission Valdas Vasiliauskas said that the new reform in Lithuania's energy sector was performed by the same lawyer and auditor companies, which served scandalous "LEO LT" (the project harshly criticised by Kubilius Government and President Grybauskaitė). According to Vasiliauskas, „Lawin“ and „Ernst & Young Baltic“ completed the reform, and after that some persons from „Ernst & Young Baltic“ were delegated to important posts in energy companies. "This is at least conflict of interest", - said Vasiliauskas to Lithuanian internet daily Alfa.lt.<ref>http://www.alfa.lt/straipsnis/15832690/laikinoji-energetikos-komisija-konservatoriai-energetikos-pertvarkai-pasitelke-savo-paciu-kritikuota-leo-lt-aptarnavusias-kontoras</ref>
 +
 
 +
According to former PM Andrius Kubilius, if the conclusions of the Commission would be taken into account, that would mean that most of the projects have to be stopped immediately.<ref>http://www.alfa.lt/straipsnis/15787653/laikinosios-energetikos-komisijos-posedyje-gasdinimai-kalejimu#.UzF2U4UUF3A</ref>
 +
 
 +
On March 29th, 2014, Lithuanian political parties signed agreement which commits to complete Visaginas NPP "as soon as possible". In the presence of Ukraine-Russia crisis, new nuclear power plant is being promoted more strongly as solution for energy independence from Russia. <ref>http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/66006/opposition-leader-deal-reached-on-lithuanian-nuclear-plant-project-201466006/</ref>.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
In 2020-2022 the NPP is supposed to be ready to be connected to the grid<ref name="Visaginas" />.
 +
 
 +
* An international [[Nuclear Waste and Pollution Conference in Vilnius 2011|anti-nuclear conference]] focusing on the new NPP construction plans of Lithuania, Belarus and Kaliningrad (Russia) took place in Vilnius (LT) on December 6-8, 2011
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Further information resources ==
 +
* [[Atomic Policy in Lithuania]]
 +
* [[Estonian energy company about investing in Visaginas NPP: "No, thanks"]]
 +
* [[Visaginas NPP fate "undecided", as politicians ignore the decision of the referendum]]
 +
* [http://vaidapi.wordpress.com/2006/11/12/a-new-nuclear-power-station-for-lithuania-would-it-really-pay-back/ Nuclear energy, environment and the public sphere]
 +
* [http://www.uzreferenduma.lt referendum initiative website]
 +
* [http://flexrisk.boku.ac.at/en/sites/visa/index.html Nuclear Site Visaginas in flexRISK]
 +
* [http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Baltic-PMs-pledge-nuclear-support Baltic PMs pledge nuclear support] ''(World Nuclear News, March 9, 2012)''
 +
* Status of proposed nuclear plants in the Baltic Sea region as of August 29, 2012<ref>composition by Bernd Ebeling, http://contratom.de as at August 29, 2012<br/>source: World Nuclear Industrial Status Report 2012, Schneider, M. et al.; Nuclear Power Reactors in the World, IAEA, Vienna, 2008</ref>:
 +
** '''Visaginas NPP''':
 +
*** proposed construction start: 2016
 +
*** proposed operation begin: 2020-2022
  
  
 
== Media coverage ==
 
== Media coverage ==
 +
* [http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/tag/visaginas-nuclear-power-plant/ Collection of articles] <small><small>English</small></small>
 +
* [http://www.delfi.lt/temos/visagino-atomine-elektrine Collection of articles] <small><small>Lithuanian</small></small>
 +
* [http://www.15min.lt/zyme/visagino-atomine-elektrine Collection of articles] <small><small>Lithuanian</small></small>
 +
* [http://www.lrytas.lt/lietuvos-diena/aktualijos/kas-issvaiste-milijonus-prokurorui-liepta-tyleti.htm#.UqVpjNJdUVM Kas iššvaistė milijonus? Prokurorui liepta tylėti] <small><small>Lithuanian</small></small>
 +
* [http://tenthousandthingsfromkyoto.blogspot.jp/2012/12/banner-action-tue-dec-18th-stop.html Banner Action Tue, Dec 18th: Stop Hitachi's Nuclear Export! Lithuanian National Referendum Says "No" To Nuclear Power] <small><small>German</small></small>
 
* [http://www.nuklearforum.ch/ebarticle.php?art_id=de-131842098266&id=de-116487550462--p-1 Litauen informiert die Europäische Kommission über Neubaupläne] <small><small>German</small></small>
 
* [http://www.nuklearforum.ch/ebarticle.php?art_id=de-131842098266&id=de-116487550462--p-1 Litauen informiert die Europäische Kommission über Neubaupläne] <small><small>German</small></small>
 
*[http://www.delfi.lv/temas/visaginas-aes?page=1 Visaginas AES] Various materials about the topic <small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 
*[http://www.delfi.lv/temas/visaginas-aes?page=1 Visaginas AES] Various materials about the topic <small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
* [http://www.ir.lv/2012/5/11/munks-un-kodolatkritumu-uzglabasanas-problema-visagina Munks un kodolatkritumu uzglabāšanas problēma Visaginā] ''(May 11, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
* [http://www.ir.lv/2012/5/30/pavluts-latvijai-lidzdaliba-visaginas-aes-projekta-nav-kritiska Pavļuts: Latvijai līdzdalība Visaginas AES projektā nav kritiska] ''(May 30, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.diena.lv/latvija/viedokli/tocs-visaginas-aes-projekts-ir-pelnijis-vismaz-diskusiju-parlamenta-13949932 Točs: Visaginas AES projekts ir pelnījis vismaz diskusiju parlamentā] ''(May 31, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.diena.lv/bizness/razosana/par-visaginas-aes-saubas-ari-igauni-13952081 Par Visaginas AES šaubās arī igauņi] ''(June 12, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 
*[http://www.ir.lv/2012/6/12/piecas-tezes-par-visaginas-aes Piecas tēzes par Visaginas AES] ''(June 12, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 
*[http://www.ir.lv/2012/6/12/piecas-tezes-par-visaginas-aes Piecas tēzes par Visaginas AES] ''(June 12, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://puaro.lv/lv/puaro/latvenergo-prognoze-visaginas-aes-koncesijas-liguma-parakstisanas-atliksanu "Latvenergo" prognozē Visaginas AES koncesijas līguma parakstīšanas atlikšanu] ''(June 18, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.db.lv/razosana/energetika/pavluts-miljards-visaginas-aes-projektam-atradisies-tikai-ja-projekts-bus-izdevigs-latvija-spiediena-372898 Pavļuts: miljards Visaginas AES projektam atradīsies tikai, ja projekts būs izdevīgs; Latvija spiedienam nepakļausies] ''(June 19, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.saeima.lv/lv/aktualitates/saeimas-zinas/19842-tautsaimniecibas-komisija-latvijas-lidzdaliba-visaginas-aes-projekta-janosaka-deklaracija Tautsaimniecības komisija: Latvijas līdzdalība Visaginas AES projektā jānosaka deklarācijā] ''(June 19, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
* [http://www.ir.lv/2012/6/19/visaginas-aes-stridigo-jautajumu-apspriesana-neesot-menesa-jautajums Visaginas AES strīdīgo jautājumu apspriešana neesot mēneša jautājums] ''(June 19, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.diena.lv/diena-tv/politika/diskusija-par-visaginas-aes-13953577?cp=1#comments Diskusija par Visaginas AES] Video ''(June 20, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
* [http://www.diena.lv/bizness/finanses/visaginas-aes-buvnieciba-sadardzinas-13953556 Visaginas AES būvniecība sadārdzinās] ''(June 20, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.ir.lv/2012/6/20/vai-arzemju-atomenergijas-malduguns Vai ārzemju atomenerģijas malduguns?] ''(June 20, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.db.lv/razosana/energetika/visaginas-aes-konsultants-lielbritanija-ir-normali-registret-uznemumus-savu-sekretaru-adreses-372961 Visaginas AES konsultants: Lielbritānijā ir normāli reģistrēt uzņēmumus savu sekretāru adresēs] ''(June 20, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.ir.lv/2012/6/25/junija-lietuva-neparakstis-vienosanos-ar-visaginas-aes-strategisko-investoru Jūnijā Lietuva neparakstīs vienošanos ar Visaginas AES stratēģisko investoru] ''(June 25, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
* [http://nra.lv/latvija/74708-latvenergo-visaginas-aes-projekta-vertesanai-izvelejies-piecus-konsultantus.htm "Latvenergo" Visaginas AES projekta vērtēšanai izvēlējies piecus konsultantus] ''(June 26, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.latvijasradio.lv/zinas/raksts.php?id=43545&gr=0 Visaginas AES projekta virzība atpaliek no termiņiem] ''(June 27, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=um5Q0xj9rjU Turpinās izvērtēt Latvijas dalību Visaginas AES projektā] Video ''(June 29, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.kasjauns.lv/lv/zinas/86331/daugavpili-riko-plasu-ekologisku-kampanu-pret-visaginas-aes Daugavpilī rīko plašu ekoloģisku kampaņu pret Visaginas AES] ''(July 2, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 
*[http://www.ir.lv/2012/7/2/kecerigas-pardomas-jaunas-atomstacijas-paena Ķecerīgas pārdomas jaunās atomstacijas paēnā] ''(July 2, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 
*[http://www.ir.lv/2012/7/2/kecerigas-pardomas-jaunas-atomstacijas-paena Ķecerīgas pārdomas jaunās atomstacijas paēnā] ''(July 2, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.apollo.lv/zinas/visaginas-aes-salidzina-ar-maksligo-vulkanu/520809 Visaginas AES salīdzina ar mākslīgo «vulkānu»] ''(July 2, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.db.lv/razosana/energetika/tarifa-atlaizu-ap-visaginas-aes-tomer-nebus-374668 Tarifa atlaižu ap Visaginas AES tomēr nebūs] ''(July 2, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.db.lv/razosana/energetika/konsultants-plano-vertet-ari-latvenergo-visaginas-aes-projekta-nepieciesamo-jaudu-374722 Konsultants plāno vērtēt arī Latvenergo Visaginas AES projektā nepieciešamo jaudu] ''(July 3, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://www.tns.lv/?lang=lv&fullarticle=true&category=showuid&id=3875 45% Latvijas ekonomiski aktīvo iedzīvotāju atbalsta Latvijas dalību Visaginas atomelektrostacijas projektā] TNS Latvia mājas lapa ''(July 10, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://nra.lv/latvija/politika/75512-aptauja-45-iedzivotaju-atbalsta-latvijas-dalibu-visaginas-atomelektrostacijas-projekta.htm Aptauja: 45% iedzīvotāju atbalsta Latvijas dalību Visaginas atomelektrostacijas projektā] NRA ''(July 10, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://nra.lv/pasaule/75606-brisele-vides-aktivisti-iestajas-pret-ieceri-baltijas-regiona-buvet-atomelektrostacijas.htm Briselē vides aktīvisti iestājas pret ieceri Baltijas reģionā būvēt atomelektrostacijas] ''(July 11, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
* [http://www.ir.lv/2012/7/16/referendums-par-visaginas-aes-nebus-juridiski-saistoss Referendums par Visaginas AES nebūs juridiski saistošs] ''(July 16, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://nra.lv/latvija/76067-kubilus-sabiedribai-par-visaginas-aes-projektu-sniegts-maksimalais-iespejamais-informacijas-apjoms.htm Kubiļus: Sabiedrībai par Visaginas AES projektu sniegts maksimālais iespējamais informācijas apjoms] ''(July 19, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://nra.lv/latvija/76527-eksperts-visaginas-aes-ir-saubiga-investicija.htm Eksperts: Visaginas AES ir šaubīga investīcija] ''(July 27, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 +
*[http://nra.lv/latvija/77059-kodolreaktora-inzenieris-tikai-piedaloties-visaginas-aes-varesim-aizstavet-savas-intereses.htm Kodolreaktora inženieris: Tikai piedaloties Visaginas AES, varēsim aizstāvēt savas intereses] ''(August 4, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 
*[http://www.ir.lv/2012/8/6/iub-liedz-latvenergo-slegt-ligumu-ar-visaginas-aes-konsultantu IUB liedz "Latvenergo" slēgt līgumu ar Visaginas AES konsultantu] ''(August 6, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
 
*[http://www.ir.lv/2012/8/6/iub-liedz-latvenergo-slegt-ligumu-ar-visaginas-aes-konsultantu IUB liedz "Latvenergo" slēgt līgumu ar Visaginas AES konsultantu] ''(August 6, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
−
 
+
*[http://nra.lv/ekonomika/latvija/80033-baltijas-ministru-padome-vienojas-dibinat-visaginas-aes-projekta-kompaniju.htm Baltijas Ministru padome vienojas dibināt Visaginas AES projekta kompāniju] ''(September 20, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
−
== Further information resources ==
+
* [http://nra.lv/ekonomika/latvija/80039-latvijas-finansialais-ieguldijums-visaginas-aes-projekta-joprojam-nav-aprekinats.htm Latvijas finansiālais ieguldījums Visaginas AES projektā joprojām nav aprēķināts] ''(September 20, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
−
* [http://www.vae.lt/en/ operator website]
+
*[http://www.apollo.lv/zinas/vienojas-dibinat-visaginas-aes-projekta-kompaniju-un-starpvaldibu-darba-grupu/531817 Vienojas dibināt Visaginas AES projekta kompāniju un starpvaldību darba grupu] ''(September 20, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
−
 
+
*[http://ceturtdiena.lv/zinas/aktualakas-zinas/92-galven-zia/5788-visaginas-aes-qparq-vai-qpretq.html Visaginas AES - "PAR" vai "PRET"?] ''(September 21, 2012)''<small><small>Latvian</small></small>
  
  
Line 25: Line 179:
 
[[Category: Nuclear Power Plant]]
 
[[Category: Nuclear Power Plant]]
 
[[Category: Lithuania]]
 
[[Category: Lithuania]]
 +
[[Category: Legal Issues]]

Latest revision as of 07:30, 3 April 2019

Technical Data Visaginas NPP
General information
Owner: The company representing investors - yet to be formed

Developer: State company group Lietuvos energija (LE)

Location: Visaginas Municipality, Lithuania

Territory:
Reactor: ABWR
Capacity: 1,358 MW
Number of reactors: 2
Type of Waste:
Safety issues
Total Radioactivity:
Sanitary Protection Zone: km
Population of the area:
Construction data
Construction to start: 2015
Status: Not clear (as of March 2014)

Summary

Visaginas NPP is a regional project intended to provide electricity for Lithuania instead of in 2009 closed Ignalina NPP. As of October 2013, there are 3 regional partners - Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia involved in the project, in addition to strategic investor GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy. NPP would be jointly owned by Japanese company Hitachi and Japanese American company GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (20 percent shares), and state owned companies Lietuvos Energija (owned by the Republic of Lithuania) (38 percent), Latvenergo (owned by the Republic of Latvia) (20 percent) and Eesti Energia (owned by the Republic of Estonia) (22 percent). In 2012, Lithuanian citizens voted against building a new NPP in the country. However, high level talks about building the plant continue. The estimated price is 17 billion Litas (4,9 billion Euros).


Critics

contact details of critical groups working against this facility

  • group name, phone, email, website, postal address
  • NGO "Community Atgaja"
phone: +370 699 33661
email: info AT atgaja.lt[1]
http://www.atgaja.lt
  • NGO "Susivienijimas ŽALI.LT"
phone: +370 654 73926
email: zali.vilnius AT gmail.com[1]
http://www.zali.lt
  • Public Enterprise "Green Policy Institute"
phone: +370 5 213 1353
email: info AT zaliojipolitika.lt[1]
http://www.zaliojipolitika.lt


Links


Background

The city of Visaginas is situated in the northeast of Lithuania, 150 km from Vilnius and 8 km from the border with Latvia. It was founded in 1975 for the workers of the Ignalina NPP on the shores of Lake Visaginas and was named Sniečkus. Four villages had been demolished for that workers' town, with the biggest one of them known as Visaginas.[2]

Proposals to construct a new NPP at the old Ignalina NPP site, that had been closed in accordance with Lithuania's accession agreement to the EU[3] at the end of 2009, have been made since 2007[4]. First discussions regarding new reactors started already in the 1990s and were continued in the 2000s[3]. In October 2011, the Lithuanian government informed the European Union about their construction plans[5]. In June 8, 2012 European Commission issued a positive opinion about the project [6].

The main reason Visaginas NPP proponents give for building new NPP in Lithuania is supposed energetic independence from Russia [7].

The Visaginas Nuclear Plant Company have been set up by electricity companies of Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, and Poland on July 30, 2008 to be responsible for the construction of the new NPP. Poland later withdrew from the project. It is supposed to be a 1,300 MW boiling water reactor[5] while earlier a maximum capacity of up to 3,400 MW distributed over two reactors had been announced[3]. On July 14, 2011[5] the GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy has been selected as a strategic investor of the project.[4] The estimated construction costs is 5 billion Euros[3]. However, given interest, inflation and expenses caused by changes in the value of investments it is likely that the costs will be 6.8 billion Euros [8].

On October 14th, 2012, 62,6 percent of Lithuanian citizens, who attended a nation-wide consultative referendum, voted "No" on a statement “I am in favor of constructing a new nuclear power plant in the Republic of Lithuania”. After that, Lithuanian politicians were trying to downplay the results of the referendum, questioning the legal consequences of the referendum. The results of the referendum are legally binding according to the Law on Referendum [9]. Following the referendum, Lithuanian Parliament formed a special working group in the Parliament, to suggest how to implement the results of the referendum [10]. The working group suggested that the Government should prepare the most cost-optimal and consumer friendly strategy of electricity supply for Lithuania [11]. Following that, the Government formed a work group to analyze the project and to propose the most cost-optimal and consumer friendly model of Lithuanian energy supply system. The chairperson of the group was Energy Minister Jaroslavas Neverovičius [12]. Lithuanian Energy Institute (LEI), which was consulted by the working group, concluded that flexible non-nuclear scenario would be more beneficial to Lithuania [13]. According to LEI, such issues as the problem of spent nuclear fuel management or the risk of catastrophies have to be evaluated, when assessing the possibility to buid such a power plant [14].

The group has concluded that it is not possible to evaluate now, what impact Visaginas NPP might have to sinchronization of European grid, as well as it is not possible to evaluate the questions of Visaginas NPP power reserve [15]. The working group proposed the "balanced and diversified energy self-provision scenario", based on "safe nuclear energy development", together with renewables. local CHP energy development, diversified gas supply sources and diversified import [16]. The work group stated that continuation of Visaginas NPP project is possible only if it meets "additional conditions": a) if expenses, responsibilities and risks are shared between Regional Partners and this is established in legal agreements; b) if financing is ensured at the lowest costs; c) if "sustained and comprehensive public awareness of the project" is ensured, "considering the fact that the project can be implemented only if national agreement on rational, competitive, sustainable and perspective electricity supply is in place." [17]. Following this statement, Lithuanian Government continued talks with "Hitachi". The reactor constructor said that they will improve economic conditions of the project [18]. In October 2013, Prime Minister Algirdas Butkevičius announced that he sees possibilities to improve the project, while Deputy Energy Minister Aleksandras Spruogis has declared that the project has already been improved and the project now is competitive [19]. Few days later, the CEO of "Lithuanian Energy" Dalius Misiūnas said that the project was improved, but is not yet commercially viable; according to him, new nuclear NPPs either in Lithuania or in Europe will need to be subsidized [20].

In November 2012, Lithuanian Public Procurement Office determined that the "Visaginas Nuclear Power Plant Company" unlawfully bought additional legal services, business consulting, financial advisor and media planning services, by choosing direct agreement as a mean of procurement [21].

Despite Latvia and Estonia are officially the partners of the project, there has been a certain reluctancy demonstrated by them towards the project. For example, on November 2013, the director of Estonian energy company "Elering" said that the project is not necessary for the region [22].

The Temporary Parliamentary Commission, which analysed former, conservatory government's work in the energy sector, on March 25th, 2014, suggested to turn to Prosecutor General's Office over 8 possible corruption cases. [23] Two before the trial investigations on Visaginas NPP are already being undertaken.[24]

The member of the Commission Valdas Vasiliauskas said that the new reform in Lithuania's energy sector was performed by the same lawyer and auditor companies, which served scandalous "LEO LT" (the project harshly criticised by Kubilius Government and President Grybauskaitė). According to Vasiliauskas, „Lawin“ and „Ernst & Young Baltic“ completed the reform, and after that some persons from „Ernst & Young Baltic“ were delegated to important posts in energy companies. "This is at least conflict of interest", - said Vasiliauskas to Lithuanian internet daily Alfa.lt.[25]

According to former PM Andrius Kubilius, if the conclusions of the Commission would be taken into account, that would mean that most of the projects have to be stopped immediately.[26]

On March 29th, 2014, Lithuanian political parties signed agreement which commits to complete Visaginas NPP "as soon as possible". In the presence of Ukraine-Russia crisis, new nuclear power plant is being promoted more strongly as solution for energy independence from Russia. [27].


In 2020-2022 the NPP is supposed to be ready to be connected to the grid[3].

  • An international anti-nuclear conference focusing on the new NPP construction plans of Lithuania, Belarus and Kaliningrad (Russia) took place in Vilnius (LT) on December 6-8, 2011


Further information resources


Media coverage


  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 For protection against automatical email address robots searching for addresses to send spam to them this email address has been made unreadable for them. To get a correct mail address you have to displace "AT" by the @-symbol.
  2. ↑ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Visaginas&oldid=445363068 as at October 15, 2011
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Visaginas_Nuclear_Power_Plant&oldid=447180300 as at October 15, 2011
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ignalina_Nuclear_Power_Plant&oldid=451980296 as at October 15, 2011
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 http://www.nuklearforum.ch/ebarticle.php?art_id=de-131842098266&id=de-116487550462--p-1 as at October 15, 2011
  6. ↑ http://ec.europa.eu/energy/doc/nuclear/2012_06_11_visaginas.pdf
  7. ↑ http://www.enmin.lt/lt/activity/veiklos_kryptys/strateginiai_projektai/vae.php?clear_cache=Y
  8. ↑ http://www.diena.lv/bizness/finanses/visaginas-aes-buvnieciba-sadardzinas-13953556.
  9. ↑ http://www.gyva.lt/articles/view/279
  10. ↑ http://www.15min.lt/naujiena/aktualu/lietuva/darbo-grupei-del-naujos-atomines-elektrines-likimo-vadovaus-irena-siauliene-56-283295#ixzz2iAMnC67o
  11. ↑ http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=439062&p_tr2=2
  12. ↑ http://www.enmin.lt/lt/news/detail.php?ID=2563
  13. ↑ http://vz.lt/article/2013/5/5/vae-tyrimas-neivertina-investiciju-trukumo?pageno=0
  14. ↑ http://de.slideshare.net/EkonomikaLT/elektros-energetikos-sistemos-perspektyvin-raida-ir-visagino-ae-ekonomiko-efektyvumo-tyrimas
  15. ↑ http://www.enmin.lt/lt/konkursai/konkursai_i_tarnyba/Darbogrupesisvados.pdf http://www.enmin.lt/lt/naujienos/Conclusions_of_the_Working_Group2.pdf
  16. ↑ http://www.enmin.lt/lt/naujienos/Conclusions_of_the_Working_Group2.pdf
  17. ↑ http://www.enmin.lt/lt/naujienos/Conclusions_of_the_Working_Group2.pdf
  18. ↑ http://www.enmin.lt/lt/apie_energetika/detail.php?ID=3017&sphrase_id=23345
  19. ↑ http://www.15min.lt/en/article/politics/lithuanian-deputy-energy-minister-improved-visaginas-npp-project-is-competitive-526-376093
  20. ↑ http://www.15min.lt/naujiena/verslas/energetika/naujas-visagino-ae-projektas-patrauklesnis-bet-vis-tiek-silpnas-664-377667
  21. ↑ http://www.15min.lt/en/article/business/lithuania-s-visaginas-nuclear-power-plant-ordered-to-cancel-contracts-with-herbert-smith-rothschild-bvrg-527-279334#ixzz2kjRghIwe
  22. ↑ http://www.15min.lt/naujiena/verslas/energetika/estijos-energetikos-imones-elering-atstovas-taavi-veskimagi-visagino-atomine-elektrine-regionui-nera-butina-664-384345?cf=vl
  23. ↑ http://www.baltic-course.com/eng/energy/?doc=89531
  24. ↑ http://www.alfa.lt/straipsnis/15832690/laikinoji-energetikos-komisija-konservatoriai-energetikos-pertvarkai-pasitelke-savo-paciu-kritikuota-leo-lt-aptarnavusias-kontoras
  25. ↑ http://www.alfa.lt/straipsnis/15832690/laikinoji-energetikos-komisija-konservatoriai-energetikos-pertvarkai-pasitelke-savo-paciu-kritikuota-leo-lt-aptarnavusias-kontoras
  26. ↑ http://www.alfa.lt/straipsnis/15787653/laikinosios-energetikos-komisijos-posedyje-gasdinimai-kalejimu#.UzF2U4UUF3A
  27. ↑ http://www.lithuaniatribune.com/66006/opposition-leader-deal-reached-on-lithuanian-nuclear-plant-project-201466006/
  28. ↑ composition by Bernd Ebeling, http://contratom.de as at August 29, 2012
    source: World Nuclear Industrial Status Report 2012, Schneider, M. et al.; Nuclear Power Reactors in the World, IAEA, Vienna, 2008

Retrieved from "http://nuclear-heritage.net/index.php?title=Visaginas_NPP&oldid=85187"