Talk:Book:Atomenergie – „ein friedlicher Mörder“/ Wer hat das Schreckgespenst „Treibhaus“ erdacht?
Conspiracy theory bullshit
Why do we have such conspiracy theory bullshit on our website? - Greenhouse effect as a fairy tale of the nuclear industry to promote atomic energy is flimflam. History showed us, that it was not at all any energy business promoting greenhouse effect idea, but that they were denying it until the very end. There is a good documentation published by Rising Tide UK about this history of lies and manipulation of the big energy business. And, we know as activists with the anti-nuclear movement, that the nuclear industry developed in 2001 the strategy to use the climate argument for their business (at least at that point of time it was proved due to the discussions in the German Atomforum event); ten years later their PR strategy was intensified in this direction.
The nuclear industry, and other big energy companies, are these days benefiting of climate policies by taking billions of grants for so-called carbon-neutral technologies research like CCS (carbon capture and storage), which is a big fraud, too, or by claiming their energy wood be CO2-neutral (which is a lie, again). However, they changed their policies when they could succeed with their tactic to deny human-made climate change, but they didn't invent it.
To promote the flimflam story of human-made greenhouse effect as a fairy tale of the nuclear industry, and to claim it would not be caused by CO2 as a main factor, is actually supporting the big energy business in dividing the energy movements (climate and anti-nuclear), and makes themselves untrustworthy. Please remove this conspiracy theory propaganda from our network website!
--Falk (talk) 21:36, 9 November 2013 (CET)
P.S.: Events like this are one of the reasons why I am carefully with copying any books or articles to our website before having read and reflected them. To have it here on this website creates the impression, this would be a position of the Nuclear Heritage Network!
