Difference between revisions of "Czech Republic"

From Nuclear Heritage
Jump to navigationJump to search
(internal links set for articles on nuclear-heritage.net)
(internal links set for articles on nuclear-heritage.net)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
* 2017, June 15 - [[PR:Government Nuclear Energy Committee – Dealing With Hundreds of Billions of Czech Crowns in a Non-Transparent Way|Government Nuclear Energy Committee – Dealing With Hundreds of Billions of Czech Crowns in a Non-Transparent Way]]
 
* 2017, June 15 - [[PR:Government Nuclear Energy Committee – Dealing With Hundreds of Billions of Czech Crowns in a Non-Transparent Way|Government Nuclear Energy Committee – Dealing With Hundreds of Billions of Czech Crowns in a Non-Transparent Way]]
 
* 2017, June 13 - [[PR:National Programme on Radioactive Waste Management: the State has thrown away its opportunity to open public debate|National Programme on Radioactive Waste Management: the State has thrown away its opportunity to open public debate]]
 
* 2017, June 13 - [[PR:National Programme on Radioactive Waste Management: the State has thrown away its opportunity to open public debate|National Programme on Radioactive Waste Management: the State has thrown away its opportunity to open public debate]]
* 2017, June 6 - [PR:Platform Against Deep Repository held a meeting in Chanovice|Platform Against Deep Repository held a meeting in Chanovice]]
+
* 2017, June 6 - [[PR:Platform Against Deep Repository held a meeting in Chanovice|Platform Against Deep Repository held a meeting in Chanovice]]
 
* 2017, April 27 - [[PR:Uranium mining is over, damages are estimated at tens of billions of Czech crowns|Uranium mining is over, damages are estimated at tens of billions of Czech crowns]]
 
* 2017, April 27 - [[PR:Uranium mining is over, damages are estimated at tens of billions of Czech crowns|Uranium mining is over, damages are estimated at tens of billions of Czech crowns]]
 
* 2017, April 7 - [[PR:Day Against Repository should be a reminder that the problem is still not being solved|Day Against Repository should be a reminder that the problem is still not being solved]]
 
* 2017, April 7 - [[PR:Day Against Repository should be a reminder that the problem is still not being solved|Day Against Repository should be a reminder that the problem is still not being solved]]
 
* 2017, March 23 - [[PR:The mayors and residents of the municipalities are calling on the Prime Minister Sobotka: Stop geological surveys for a deep geological repository|The mayors and residents of the municipalities are calling on the Prime Minister Sobotka: Stop geological surveys for a deep geological repository]]
 
* 2017, March 23 - [[PR:The mayors and residents of the municipalities are calling on the Prime Minister Sobotka: Stop geological surveys for a deep geological repository|The mayors and residents of the municipalities are calling on the Prime Minister Sobotka: Stop geological surveys for a deep geological repository]]
* 2017, March 1 - [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/index.php/PR:Municipalities_threatened_by_a_deep_geological_repository_have_succeeded:_the_state_must_stop_geological_surveys_in_seven_sites Municipalities threatened by a deep geological repository have succeeded: the state must stop geological surveys in seven sites]
+
* 2017, March 1 - [[PR:Municipalities threatened by a deep geological repository have succeeded: the state must stop geological surveys in seven sites|Municipalities threatened by a deep geological repository have succeeded: the state must stop geological surveys in seven sites]]
* 2017, February 23 - [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/index.php/PR:The_Platform_grows_stronger_and_negotiates_with_politicians:_it_wants_a_different_solution_to_the_problem_with_radioactive_waste The Platform grows stronger and negotiates with politicians: it wants a different solution to the problem with radioactive waste]
+
* 2017, February 23 - [[PR:The Platform grows stronger and negotiates with politicians: it wants a different solution to the problem with radioactive waste|The Platform grows stronger and negotiates with politicians: it wants a different solution to the problem with radioactive waste]]
* 2017, January 25 - [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/index.php/PR:Will_the_new_Raw_Material_Policy_open_the_door_to_uranium_mining_in_Brzkov%3F_Comments_on_the_draft_can_be_submitted_until_February_11 Will the new Raw Material Policy open the door to uranium mining in Brzkov? Comments on the draft can be submitted until February 11]
+
* 2017, January 25 - [[PR:Will the new Raw Material Policy open the door to uranium mining in Brzkov? Comments on the draft can be submitted until February 11|Will the new Raw Material Policy open the door to uranium mining in Brzkov? Comments on the draft can be submitted until February 11]]
* 2017, January 16 - [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/index.php/PR:Minister_Ml%C3%A1dek_fails_at_the_siting_process_for_a_deep_geological_repository Minister Mládek fails at the siting process for a deep geological repository]
+
* 2017, January 16 - [[PR:Minister Mládek fails at the siting process for a deep geological repository|Minister Mládek fails at the siting process for a deep geological repository]]
* 2017, January 15 - [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/index.php/PR:We_need_the_Act_to_strengthen_the_rights_of_municipalities_in_the_siting_process_for_a_deep_geological_repository_-_Although_the_proposal_will_be_discussed_by_the_government,_the_Act_will_not_be_approved_soon_due_to_the_Ministry_of_Industry We need the Act to strengthen the rights of municipalities in the siting process for a deep geological repository - Although the proposal will be discussed by the Government, the Act will not be approved soon, due to the Ministry of Industry]
+
* 2017, January 15 - [[PR:We need the Act to strengthen the rights of municipalities in the siting process for a deep geological repository - Although the proposal will be discussed by the government, the Act will not be approved soon due to the Ministry of Industry|We need the Act to strengthen the rights of municipalities in the siting process for a deep geological repository - Although the proposal will be discussed by the Government, the Act will not be approved soon, due to the Ministry of Industry]]
 
* 2017, January 2 - [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/index.php/PR:Validity_of_exploration_areas_for_a_deep_repository_has_expired Validity of exploration areas for a deep repository has expired]
 
* 2017, January 2 - [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/index.php/PR:Validity_of_exploration_areas_for_a_deep_repository_has_expired Validity of exploration areas for a deep repository has expired]
 
* 2017, January 2 - [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/index.php/PR:The_Ministry_of_Industry_has_admitted:_a_statement_about_the_cancelled_plan_to_transfer_uranium_mining_to_Brzkov_was_untrue_-_Residents_of_municipalities_threatened_by_uranium_mining_await_a_challenging_year The Ministry of Industry has admitted: a statement about the cancelled plan to transfer uranium mining to Brzkov was untrue - Residents of municipalities threatened by uranium mining await a challenging year]
 
* 2017, January 2 - [http://www.nuclear-heritage.net/index.php/PR:The_Ministry_of_Industry_has_admitted:_a_statement_about_the_cancelled_plan_to_transfer_uranium_mining_to_Brzkov_was_untrue_-_Residents_of_municipalities_threatened_by_uranium_mining_await_a_challenging_year The Ministry of Industry has admitted: a statement about the cancelled plan to transfer uranium mining to Brzkov was untrue - Residents of municipalities threatened by uranium mining await a challenging year]

Revision as of 10:52, 26 January 2018

Media platform - PRESS RELEASES by CALLA *and* PLATFORM AGAINST DEEP REPOSITORY:


NukeNews: