Power Structures

From Nuclear Heritage
Revision as of 03:14, 20 October 2013 by Kardan (talk | contribs) (→‎Russia)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Languages

[[::Power Structures|English]] • [[::Power Structures/cz|Czech]] • [[::Power Structures/fi|Finnish]] • [[::Power Structures/fr|French]] • [[::Power Structures/de|German]] • [[::Power Structures/li|Lithuanian]] • [[::Power Structures/ru|Russian]]

Please help to support more languages for this page!


Please read Power Structure Research first. This this site tries to visualize nuclear power structures per country. The focus is on people of political and economic elites like lobbyists and decision makers.


UNDER CONSTRUCTION


Belarus

NPPs Repositories Mines
  1. Ostrovets NPP (Belarus) - (promised by T in Russian)
    • new reactor planned / under construction
none Template:Mining Belarus


Denmark

NPPs Repositories Mines
  1. Risö Research Reactor (Denmark)
    • decommissioned reactor[1]
  1. Danish final disposal attempts[2] (Denmark)
Template:Mining Denmark


Estonia

NPPs Repositories Mines
Template:NPP Estonia
  1. Estonian Repository
    • In Estonia, near the town of Sillamäe on the shore of the Gulf of Finland there is a large waste depository.[3] In Estonia, near the town of Sillamäe on the shore of the Gulf of Finland there is a large (50 hectares) waste depository. The total radioactive waste amount there is 12 million tons and of that amount about half originates from the enrichment of uranium. An international project for the restoration of the area was completed in 2008.[4]


Template:Mining Estonia


Finland

NPPs Repositories Mines
Simo
File:NPP:Simo File:Map:Simo
operator e.on-Fennovoima employees
nearby inhabitants 160 accidents
reactor type BWR-2500 / EPR (PWR) fuel
size capacity
status Proposed production missing
waste per year emissions
construction - runtime -
comment text needs revising


Olkiluoto NPP
File:NPP:Olkiluoto NPP File:Map:Olkiluoto NPP
operator employees
nearby inhabitants accidents
reactor type fuel
size capacity
status production missing
waste per year emissions
construction - runtime -
comment existing reactors[5], new additional reactor under construction (OL-3)[6] and planned (OL-4)


FiR 1 Research Reactor
File:NPP:FiR 1 Research Reactor File:Map:FiR 1 Research Reactor
operator employees
nearby inhabitants accidents
reactor type fuel
size capacity
status production missing
waste per year emissions
construction - runtime -
comment Otaniemi/Espoo[7]


Loviisa
File:NPP:Loviisa File:Map:Loviisa
operator employees
nearby inhabitants accidents
reactor type fuel
size capacity
status production missing
waste per year emissions
construction - runtime -
comment existing reactors[8]


Ruotsinpyhtää NPP
File:NPP:Ruotsinpyhtää NPP File:Map:Ruotsinpyhtää NPP
operator employees
nearby inhabitants accidents
reactor type fuel
size capacity
status production missing
waste per year emissions
construction - runtime -
comment [9][10]
  1. Onkalo[11] (Finland)
    • final repository for HAW from Olkiluoto and Loviisa on the Olkiluoto NPP site
  2. Olkiluoto VLJ Repository[12] (Finland)
  3. final repository at the Loviisa NPP site[13]
    • for LMAW, and possible also for radioactive waste from decommissioning Loviisa and Olkiluoto NPP
  1. Ranua[14] (Finland) - (nothing)
  2. Tervola uranium site (Finland)
  3. Ylitornio uranium site (Rovaniemi, Finland)
  4. Sokli mining site[15] (Finland)
  5. Talvivaara mining site (Finland)
[[:Category: Finland|]]'s atomic policy

File:Map:Finland

Reactors: 6
Repositories: 3
Mines: 5


Germany

NPPs Repositories Mines
  1. Greifswald NPP[16] (Germany)
    • decommissioned NPP
  2. SUR Research Reactor Kiel[17] (Germany)
    • Siemens reactor for educational issues
  1. Asse II - collapsed final repository
  2. Morsleben - collapsed final repository
  3. Schacht Konrad - licensed final repository
  4. Gorleben - proposed final repository
  5. ZLN Lubmin[18] - temporary repository


Template:Mining Germany


Latvia

NPPs Repositories Mines
  1. Salaspils Research Reactor (Latvia)
    • being decommissioned
  2. Pāvilostas NPP (Latvia)
  1. Radons (Latvia) - (nearly done)
    • closed repository? No
Template:Mining Latvia


Lithuania

NPPs Repositories Mines
  1. Ignalina NPP (Lithuania) - (promised by L)
  2. Visaginas NPP (Lithuania) - (promised by L)
  1. Lithuanian repositories (two sites) - (promised by Li)
Template:Mining Lithuania
[[:Category: Lithuania|]]'s atomic policy

File:Map:Lithuania

Reactors: 0 (2)
Repositories: 0 (1)
Mines: 0


Publications

Companies

This should be incorporated to Nuclear Companies

Norway

NPPs Repositories Mines
  1. Norwegian research reactors at Kjeller and Halden [28][29] (added to list by imota)
none Template:Mining Norway


Poland

NPPs Repositories Mines
  1. Jezioro Żarnowieckie NPP (Poland)
    • old NPP project cancelled[30], new NPP planned
  2. National Center for Nuclear Research, Swierk - Poland[31]
    • Polish Research Reactors AGATA, ANNA, EWA, MARIA [32]
  3. research reactor MARYLA, krakow - poland
    • unloaded and dismanteled[33]
  1. National Radioactive Waste Repository, Rozan (Poland)
  1. Miningsites in Lower Silesia (Poland)


Sweden

NPPs Repositories Mines
  1. Barsebäck NPP[34] (Sweden)
    • closed NPP
  2. Oskarshamn NPP[35] (Sweden)
  3. Studsvik Research Reactor
    • decommissioned
  4. Stockholm Research Reactor[36]
    • decommissioned
  5. Marviken NPP[37] (Sweden)
    • abandoned reactor project
  6. Forsmark NPP[38] (Sweden)
    • existing NPP, new reactors planned
  7. Ringhals NPP [39] (Sweden) (added by imota)
  8. Ågestaverket NPP[40] (Sweden)
    • NPP closed in 1974
  1. final disposal site for LMAW at the Oskarshamn NPP site
  2. Labority for incapsulation[36]
    • experimental incapsulation plant for nuclear waste on Oskarshamn NPP site
  3. Äspölaboratoriet[36]
    • near Figeholm, north of Oskarshamn
    • 500 m deep research site for nuclear fuel final repository
  4. SFR Repository[41]
    • final repository for LMAW from Swedish reactors, located on the Forsmark NPP site. Located in the bedrock under the Baltic Sea.
  5. Forsmark HAW repository
    • proposed site for final disposal of HAW (spent fuel), to be built next to the SFR Repository, but not connected with it.[42]
  6. Clab repository[43]
    • central Swedish interim repository for spent fuel elements (HAW) on the Oskarshamn NPP site


  1. Vinterviken/Liljeholmen in Stockholm[36]
    • experimental uranium extraction from Swedish uranium ore
  2. Kvarntorp in Närke[36]
    • experimental uranium extraction from local ore, and experimental heavy water production
  3. Häggån (Sweden)
  4. Nianfors (Sweden) - (maybe take article that's already there?)


Russia

NPPs Repositories Mines
    • proposed Fennovoima site next to Loviisa - failed because of strong resistance of the public in Loviisa
  1. Leningrad NPP (St. Petersburg, Russia)
    • existing reactors, new additional reactors under construction and planned[44]
  2. Sosnowy Bor NPP (Russia)
    • cancelled reactor project
  3. Research reactor PIK in Gatchina, at Petersburg Institute of Nuclear Science [45] (added to list by imota)
  4. Baltic NPP (Kaliningrad, Russia)
    • new NPP planned / under construction[46]
Mayak (see also Kyshtym Disaster) at Techa river Template:Mining Russia


  • Representatives of 12 EU member states, namely Bulgaria, the United Kingdom, Hungary, Spain, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Finland, the Netherlands, France and Czechoslovakia have confirmed their plans to promote nuclear energy.
  • Director of the Nuclear Energy Department of the Energy Ministry of the Republic of Belarus Nikolai Grusha[47]
  • Advisor to the Executive Vice-President of Rusatom Overseas Sergei Boyarkin[48]

Director General of the Russian state corporation for nuclear energy Rosatom Sergei Kiriyenko has recently visited the construction site. He praised the high quality of works and said that Belarusian construction workers might get licenses to build nuclear power plants in Russia.

Even Japan announced its decision to consider resuming the nuclear power program two years after the Fukushima accident. What is Belarus’ strategy for developing nuclear energy? What are the advantages of the Russian NPP design? How will the Belarusian NPP be protected from external emergencies? Is there any connection between the NPP and greenhouse effect? These and other questions will be answered by Nikolai Grusha and Sergei Boyarkin during the online conference.

Belarus launched its own nuclear program not so long ago; however the IAEA experts believe that our country can be called one of the most advanced newcomers. The quality of preparation works on the Ostrovets site was hailed by Russian and international experts. As early as the summer of 2013 the concrete will be poured

References

  1. http://www.greenkids.de/europas-atomerbe/index.php?title=Baltic_Sea_Info_Tour/Copenhagen&oldid=56847 - February 28, 2011
  2. http://www.contratom.de/2011/05/07/danemark-plant-atommullendlager-nahe-fehmarn/ as at May 7, 2011
  3. http://www.stuk.fi/ydinturvallisuus/ydinjatteet/ydinjatteet_maailmalla/en_GB/maailmalla/ - December 11, 2010
  4. http://www.stuk.fi/ydinturvallisuus/ydinjatteet/ydinjatteet_maailmalla/en_GB/lahialueet/ - December 11, 2010
  5. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=504 - December 8, 2010
  6. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=505 - December 8, 2010
  7. http://www.stuk.fi/ydinturvallisuus/ydinjatteet/ydinjate/en_GB/ydinjate/ - December 10, 2010
  8. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=502 - December 8, 2010
  9. http://www.tem.fi/files/21275/38981_TEM_Nuclear_Energy_in_Finland_LR.pdf - December 11, 2010
  10. http://www.fennovoima.fi/en/fennovoima/media/press-releases/press-releases/fennovoima-to-evaluate-nuclear-power-plant-suitability-in-ruotsinpyhtaa as at August 20, 2013
  11. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=508 - December 8, 2010
  12. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=507 - December 8, 2010
  13. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=503 - December 8, 2010
  14. see http://www.greenkids.de/europas-atomerbe/index.php?title=Ranua_Uranium_Exploration_Action&oldid=53794
  15. see: Uranium Mining in Savukoski
  16. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=168 - December 8, 2010
  17. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=144 - December 8, 2010
  18. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=169 - December 8, 2010
  19. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=254 - December 8, 2010
  20. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=254 - December 8, 2010
  21. "Lietuvos Energijos gamyba acquires Lietuvos Elektrine shares", The Baltic Course, (2010-10-13).
  22. "Lietuvos Energijos gamyba to acquire Geoterma shares", , (2007-12-27).
  23. "Head Office of Lietuvos Energija Relocated to Elektrėnai" (press release). Lietuvos Energija. 2010-08-31. Retrieved 2010-10-29
  24. Venkataraman Krishnaswamy, Gary Stuggins (2003): Private Sector Participation in the Power Sector in Europe and Central Asia, 978-0-8213-5529-9 http://books.google.com/books?id=GBNnUPUkyv8C&pg=PA73&lpg=PA73
  25. "Baltics Solve Dispute Over Cross-Border Power Flows in Nord Pool", , (15 March 2013).
  26. Euroinvestor.com
  27. Statistics
  28. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/List_of_nuclear_reactors#Norway - February 6, 2011
  29. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Institute_for_Energy_Technology - February 6, 2011
  30. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=495 - December 8, 2010
  31. http://www.ncbj.gov.pl/
  32. http://www.contratom.de/atomstandorte/?land=46 - December 28, 2011
  33. http://www.paa.gov.pl/en/doc/3rdreport_JointConv.pdf
  34. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=299 - December 8, 2010
  35. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=301 - December 8, 2010
  36. 36.0 36.1 36.2 36.3 36.4 http://www.tekniskamuseet.se/1/867.html as at July 17, 2013
  37. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=484 - December 8, 2010
  38. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=300 - December 8, 2010
  39. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Ringhals_Nuclear_Power_Plant - February 6, 2011
  40. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=483 - December 8, 2010
  41. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=514 - December 8, 2010
  42. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Forsmark_Nuclear_Power_Plant#Waste_disposal (no primary source given) - February 21, 2011
  43. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=511 - December 8, 2010
  44. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=277 - December 8, 2010
  45. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Gatchina#20th_century_history - February 6, 2011
  46. http://www.contratom.de/2.0/index.php?mod=standort&id=1147 - December 8, 2010
  47. http://nuclear-news.net/2013/03/21/belta-to-host-online-conference-on-nuclear-energy-on-22-march/
  48. http://nuclear-news.net/2013/03/21/belta-to-host-online-conference-on-nuclear-energy-on-22-march/