Difference between revisions of "Lithuania's agreement with Hitachi criticized"

From Nuclear Heritage
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(+cat)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Meanwhile, two citizen initiatives are collecting signatures so that referendums on the future of nuclear energy in Lithuania would take place. Also, a proposal from Parliament members to hold a referendum on this issue is being discussed in the Parliament.
 
Meanwhile, two citizen initiatives are collecting signatures so that referendums on the future of nuclear energy in Lithuania would take place. Also, a proposal from Parliament members to hold a referendum on this issue is being discussed in the Parliament.
 
== Participation in Visaginas project bad for Eesti Energia and Latvenergo ==
 
Credit rating agency “Moody's Investors Service” have issued a report stating that Estonia's and Latvia's participation in Visaginas NPP project might negatively affect both countries' energy companies' credit ratings.
 
 
More information:
 
* http://www.bne.eu/story3584/Lithuanias_slow_slow_quick_quick_slow_nuclear_foxtrot
 
  
  
Line 18: Line 12:
 
[[Category: Nuclear Power Plant]]
 
[[Category: Nuclear Power Plant]]
 
[[Category: News]]
 
[[Category: News]]
 +
[[Category: English]]
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 17:52, 6 June 2015

Visaginas nuclear power plant (NPP) project would not be profitable. This is one of the reasons, why Lithuanian Green Party urges the Parliament not to approve the Concession Agreement with Japanese company Hitachi. The reasons were set out in Lithuanian Green Party's statement, prepared in cooperation with Lithuanian Energy Consultants Association and Green Policy Institute. The statement was prepared as analysis of Visaginas NPP Business Plan, upon which the Concession Agreement is based. Other criticism includes that projected decommissioning costs in the Business Plan are too low: they are estimated to be 5 to 10 times lower than costs asked from European Commission for Ignalina NPP decommissioning. Lithuanian Green Party also criticized that Business Plan ignored the costs associated with deep repositories for high level radioactive waste, among other things.

On 17th of May, Lithuanian Parliament approved National Strategy of Energy Independence, which emphasizes nuclear development, for further discussion in the Parliament. At the same day, the Law on Concession Agreement with “Hitachi” was also approved for further discussion.

Meanwhile, two citizen initiatives are collecting signatures so that referendums on the future of nuclear energy in Lithuania would take place. Also, a proposal from Parliament members to hold a referendum on this issue is being discussed in the Parliament.